Back Articles Debate It's time to focus on Israel's separation policy, not just the siege

It's time to focus on Israel's separation policy, not just the siege

It's time to focus on Israel's separation policy, not just the siegeIsrael's approach to the Gaza Strip has never been static; it changes according to the government's priorities and short or long-term strategic goals. As early as 1991, Israel implemented the permit regime, regulating the movement of Palestinians in and out of the West Bank and Gaza Strip, and in the case of the latter, it went on to construct a perimeter fence in the mid-1990s.

During the Second Intifada, the Gaza Strip was subjected to fierce Israeli military attacks, though none of the assaults were as brutal as "Operation Cast Lead" in December 2008-January 2009. The so-called "disengagement" plan of 2005, resulting in the withdrawal of Jewish settlers from Gaza and the redeployment of Israeli forces based there, heralded another change, a process shaped subsequently by the results of the Palestinian Legislative Council elections in January 2006.

Following Hamas's electoral success and resultant victorious struggle with Fatah for control in Gaza in 2007, Israel imposed a tight blockade of the Gaza Strip, restricting drastically the kind of goods which were allowed in and out, as well as reducing the number of Palestinians granted exit permits. As a result, and compounded by the slaughter of 2009, many activists around the world began campaigning around a demand to "end the siege".

In its propaganda efforts, Israel and the Israel Defence Forces (IDF) focus on the number of lorries entering Gaza each week; they rarely, if ever, mention the issue of exports. This is because while there has been an easing of restrictions of goods allowed into the Strip, Israel's block on goods going out continues to damage the Palestinian economy.

As of this summer, and with the exception of two shipments of date bars, "for the past five years there has been a complete ban on the sale of Gaza-made products in the West Bank and Israel". For example: over four weeks in April, 1.7 million people were allowed to export just 20 truckloads of produce from Gaza. Prior to the Israeli restrictions, "Gaza exported an average of 86 truckloads a day, 85 per cent of which went to the West Bank and Israel". In 2011, monthly exports from Gaza were around 2 per cent of the corresponding figure for January to June 2007.

The Israel-imposed ban on exports is a key part of a broader "separation policy", which, in the words of the Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories, IDF Major General Eitan Dangot, is intended to "separate" the Gaza Strip from the West Bank to put pressure on Hamas. As journalist Amira Hass has insisted, however, this policy of separation "that does not allow the populations of the two parts of the same geographic entity (according to the Oslo Accords) to mix…is a policy of de facto disconnection, which began 15 years before Hamas took power in Gaza in 2006".

The separation policy can be summarised by "the two main restrictions" it encompasses: "the prohibition on marketing goods from Gaza in Israel and the West Bank and the narrow criteria for travel by individuals between the Gaza Strip and the West Bank". The latter includes examples like the five female students from Gaza prevented from travelling to the West Bank as part of what the Israeli state has admitted is "a blanket ban on travel for all students from Gaza who wish to study in the West Bank".

There are a number of goals being advanced through Israel's separation policy. First, it prevents the emergence of a genuinely independent Palestinian state in the Occupied Palestinian Territories. The Fatah-Hamas division has served Israeli purposes very nicely, but as previously noted the de facto splitting of the two areas predates the internal Palestinian conflict.

Secondly, the isolation of the Gaza Strip is part of continued efforts to prevent Hamas from being granted international legitimacy, and ensure that the organisation is primarily seen through the prism of violent confrontation – the "terrorist" government of an "enemy entity".

Thirdly, recall one of the strategic reasons for the 2005 Gaza withdrawal, namely to enable Israel to "write off" 1.7 million Palestinians from its demographic calculations. These days, Israeli commentators urge solutions for the West Bank of various kinds, often omitting entirely even to mention the Gaza Strip. Fenced off, separated; one recalls Yitzhak Rabin's words in 1992 that he wished Gaza "would just sink into the sea".

What all of this means is that the language of, and campaign focus on, "siege" and "blockade" is insufficient, and sometimes incorrect. It goes without saying that Palestinians in Gaza face dire economic circumstances: unemployment reached 31.5 per cent in the first quarter of 2012 (compared to 20.1 per cent in the West Bank). More than 70 per cent of the population receives humanitarian aid. The IDF maintains a three-mile fishing limit and perimeter fence "buffer zone" with deadly force.

Nevertheless, analysis and campaigning can't stand still as conditions change on the ground. Political developments in Egypt have had a positive impact on the ability of Palestinians to enter and leave Gaza through Rafah. And as Israeli NGO Gisha notes, in the past five years

Israel's policy of closure on the Strip has undergone important changes. Today Gaza is more opened up towards the outside world, however sweeping and indiscriminate restrictions on travel and on movement of goods between Gaza and the West Bank and Israel remain nearly unchanged.

The focus must be on the way in which Israel is deliberately separating Gaza from the West Bank, with a policy of collective punishment that hits families, students and businesses hard. "While the number of individual exits to Egypt has risen nearly to pre-closure numbers, movement to Israel and the West Bank remains at less than 1 per cent of the volume before significant restrictions were imposed at the outbreak of the Second Intifada in 2000". It is time for Israel's "separation policy" to receive as much attention as the "siege" in advocacy efforts in the West.

Ben White is an activist and writer. His latest book is "Palestinians in Israel: Segregation, Discrimination and Democracy"


Comments

Please respect and abide by our Community Guidelines when leaving comments.


Archived Comments

Comments displayed below are past comments for referencing purposes. They are no longer available for moderation or replies.

+2 # The greatest theft of the world
Bea 16-08-2012
The fact is that Zionists have been stolen Palestinian since 19th century, and that this myth about Jewish "return" is only a myth. The Jews from Europe are descendants of Khazarian people, not semitic groups from Palestine.
So, all means Palestinians have to expel the invaders were, are and will be licit and lawful. The rest is hasbara, the propaganda arm of the terrorists from Israel.
-3 # JH
Julia Harris 14-08-2012
Terrible article, telling one side of the story, making the Arabs out to be some kind of peace loviing people, not mentioning the constant terror in the form of rockets and murder of Israeli's, the genocidal threats, one only has to look at the wider middle east to understand the blood thirsty nature of Arabs, they bring it upon themselves.

White fails mention "Introduction of 270 cargo truck and truck vegetables export to Saudi " from Gaza

http://www.wafa.ps/arabic/index.php?action=detail&id=136717

His only motivation is to demonize Israel, never tell the whole story.
-5 # RE: It's time to focus on Israel's separation policy, not just the siege
vinnie gambini 14-08-2012
The bottom line is simple.
Jews were kicked out of ALL Arab countries from 1948.
No reparations were paid.
Property was confiscated and no right of return was allowed.
You're dreaming if you think Jews are going to allow so called Palestinians to tell them how to live in the land they're willing to share with these former refugees from Trans-Jordan.
Israel shares their land with occupying refugees, even allows them to incarnate themselves into a 'Palestinian' people and even allows them to identify themselves as a nation on the host country land??
Who does this ever in the history of man?
Never happened.

Notwithstanding the facts on the ground.
The reality which most people seem to ignore.
After 2000 years, the JEWS ARE BACK!

Within 60 years the smallest most industrious little country in the M.E.
From a desert to an agricultural wonder.
From sand to silicon chip factories.
From dust to medical breakthroughs.
From holocaust victims to IDF.

Ya really think this is a coincidence?
Snap-out-0f-it pal..

The prophets wrote of this long ago.

Disaster comes to those who curse Israel and blessings to those who bless Israel.
Now, hold your tongue, move your brain, and start thinking.

Who's living in poverty, economic chaos, civil disorder and violent unjust societies..............


Well partner, now you're starting to get the picture.
It's ok, it's perfectly natural to hate Jews.
But, keep it healthy, don't get sucked into the dark side where it takes over your sense of being and you morph into Nazi style never ending hate obsession.

Look around, see how they live.
The don't live.
They eek out a living.
They live with hate, violence, lawlessness, theft, embezzlement, killing, women abuse. etc. etc.mu.

If they BEHAVED, like adults, rational, calm, reasonable people, Israel would give them the moon.
As long as they act like kids, shooting rockets, killing, etc etc, Israel will keep them behind the wall and that's how it's going to stay.

Gd bless Israel and those that bless Israel may Gd bless them.
-5 # RE: It's time to focus on Israel's separation policy, not just the siege
cityca 13-08-2012
The author omits the fact that since the last 'cease fire', 1,614 missiles have been fired into Israel from Gaza.

What other country would tolerate even a fraction of that type of war crime being used against it and still provide ANY kind of goods to be transported to aid what can only be described as the enemy? Not one other country would permit this.

And the author mentions only in passing Egypt, which also maintains a border with Gaza, yet he seems to have no issue with Egypt not providing the open border he demands from Israel.

I suggest that if Gaza wishes to improve its relationship with Israel and start to enjoy a better chance of its goods being given free passage through Israel, it stops firing rockets across the border.

The author demands rights, but ignores responsibilities.