clear

Creating new perspectives since 2009

When Middle Eastern solidarity meets an unexpected Indonesian rebuff

December 10, 2025 at 1:10 pm

Residents wade through while carrying their stuff to safety after heavy rain inundated neighborhoods in Medankrio distric, Deli Serdang Regency, North Sumatera Province, Indonesia on November 27, 2025. [Kiki Cahyadi – Anadolu Agency]

Listen
0:00 / 0:00
1.0x
Ready

Catastrophic floods and landslides struck Indonesia’s Sumatra island in late November and early December after days of torrential rain. The disaster resulted in more than 950 fatalities, with over 270 people still missing and more than 770,000 displaced. Damage exceeded USD 3.1 billion, wiping out roads, bridges, plantations, schools, and entire neighborhoods. Power and communication lines collapsed, leaving parts of Aceh, North Sumatra, and West Sumatra isolated for days.

For readers unfamiliar with Indonesia, disasters of this scale are tragically not rare. The country of nearly 280 million people sits on the seismically active Pacific “Ring of Fire,” spread across more than 17,000 islands. Floods, earthquakes, and volcanic eruptions are annual realities. Indonesia is also home to the world’s largest Muslim-majority population, which has historically kept it closely connected to the Middle East through religion, trade, and migration.

This connection was immediately visible in the days following the disaster. On 1 December, Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman sent a personal telegram to Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto expressing “deep sorrow,” followed by a parallel message from King Salman. The United Arab Emirates publicly announced it had humanitarian assistance on standby, with Ambassador Abdulla Salem Al Dhaheri stating that the UAE was ready to deploy relief teams and supplies “as soon as Indonesia declares its openness.” Qatar’s Emir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani sent condolences. Oman’s Sultan Haitham bin Tariq and Iran’s President Masoud Pezeshkian also expressed sympathy, with Tehran offering to dispatch emergency teams. The Organization of Islamic Cooperation, representing 57 Muslim-majority states, urged rapid support.

READ: Indonesia and the UAE deepen cooperation through steady, low-profile moves

These were not symbolic gestures. The Middle East has deep ties to Indonesia: millions of Indonesian workers live in Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Qatar, and Oman; Gulf sovereign wealth funds are heavily invested in Indonesian infrastructure and agriculture; and Jakarta increasingly sees the Middle East as a strategic partner. The impulse to help was immediate and sincere.

Yet Indonesia responded cautiously. On 5 December, Indonesian Foreign Minister Sugiono declared that “international assistance is not yet necessary,” explaining that domestic capacity remained sufficient. State Secretary Prasetyo Hadi repeated the message the next day, saying the government had its own “considerations.”

To many in the Middle East, the refusal was perplexing. The humanitarian need was enormous, and assistance was coming from friendly states with neither political preconditions nor strategic demands.

Indonesia’s hesitancy is rooted in its political history. After the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami devastated Aceh—resulting in the loss of more than 160,000 lives—the country saw an unprecedented influx of foreign militaries, NGOs, and aid teams. While that aid saved lives, it also sparked unease within Indonesia’s political elite about sovereignty and international oversight. Since then, the Indonesian government has been reluctant to accept large-scale foreign assistance unless a “national disaster” is formally declared—a designation used only twice: for the 2004 tsunami and the COVID-19 pandemic. Jakarta has not applied that designation to the current floods, leaving foreign aid effectively restricted.

Another layer of sensitivity involves environmental governance. Indonesian civil society groups—including Mining Advocacy Network (JATAM) and the Indonesian Forum for the Environment (Walhi)—have identified overlaps between upstream mining and plantation concessions and the regions hit hardest by the floods. According to their mapping, licenses for mining, oil and gas exploration, and industrial forestry plantations sit across critical watersheds. Activists argue these concessions have contributed to deforestation, slope erosion, and river degradation, increasing the frequency and intensity of flooding.

READ: Indonesian Navy says 3 hospital ships ready for Gaza mission

Some concessions, they point out, have historical or indirect links to business figures associated with Indonesian political elites. These claims are contested and politically sensitive, but they shape the domestic climate. Allowing international teams—engineers, hydrologists, disaster analysts—into affected areas could risk exposing governance failures or drawing global attention to environmental mismanagement. For a new administration eager to project control and capability, such scrutiny is unwelcome.

From a Middle Eastern perspective, however, the situation looks different. MENA countries acted out of compassion, religious solidarity, and genuine partnership. The aid offers were expressions of shared faith and shared humanity. The Indonesian government’s reluctance created an uncomfortable gap between heartfelt goodwill from the region and Jakarta’s inward-looking political calculations.

This episode does not diminish the long-standing relationship between Indonesia and the Middle East. Pilgrimage routes, worker migration, investments, and religious scholarship will continue to bind them together. But the floods reveal how Indonesia’s domestic political considerations can override external expectations, even from close partners.

In humanitarian crises, strength is not measured by managing alone but by the willingness to accept help when lives are at stake. The Middle East responded with sincerity and speed. Indonesia responded with caution shaped by history, sovereignty, and sensitivities around environmental governance.

The relationship remains strong—but the moment exposed a subtle and growing distance between solidarity offered and solidarity accepted.

OPINION: No bridges with genocide: Why Indonesians must reject the Israel–Indonesia Futures Program

The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Monitor.