The raging bull in the chinaware shop

Donald Trump is not a strategic thinker but an incredible force of nature. He is, at best, a reactive tactician. He enters complex situations with blunt force, mistakes disruption for strength, and leaves others to calculate the damage. This pattern has defined his domestic politics. It now defines American power.

Set aside the chaos at home — the deployment of federal immigration forces, ICE, into US cities, the protests that followed, and the deaths of civilians caught in the spiral of escalation. Set aside the unsubstantiated claim that he “ended eight wars,” the exaggeration of tariff revenues, and the myth of effortless dominance. What matters is the perceived image. Trump is viewed as a raging bull in a chinaware shop, confusing destruction with determination and scaring his allies. “Mr. President, if we get to November of 2026 and people’s 401(k)s are down 30 per cent and prices are up 10–20 per cent at the supermarket, we’re going to face a bloodbath. You’re going to lose the House, you’re going to lose the Senate, and you’re going to spend the next two years being impeached every single week;” a remark attributed to Senator Ted Cruz (R-Texas) from leaked audio of a private donor meeting in 2025/2026, where Cruz sharply criticised the economic fallout of Trump’s sweeping tariffs.

Trump’s foreign policy is not anchored in sound doctrine or restraint, but in impulse and grievance. Allies and adversaries are treated interchangeably — as obstacles to be coerced rather than partners to be managed. Canada is publicly threatened. “The tone with which the President and his cabinet members have engaged with our allies is both shocking and offensive. By threatening a NATO ally over Greenland, he has put at question our trustworthiness and reliability; he risked a lot and gained virtually nothing” stated Senator Chris Coons (D-Delaware), in January 2026, after leading a bipartisan delegation to Copenhagen to reassure Denmark following Trump’s threats of annexation and tariffs.

Venezuela has become a theatre of intimidation. When Trump boasts about abducting a sitting president, Nicolás Maduro, the plausibility of the claim is irrelevant. The message is domination as spectacle.

This same moral emptiness defines Trump’s embrace of Israel’s genocidal war on Gaza. The mass killing of civilians, the flattening of neighbourhoods, and the reduction of an entire population to humanitarian ruin are dismissed as unfortunate necessities. Trump does not see collective punishment. He sees loyalty rewarded. In his worldview, law is compliant, and restraint is weakness. Genocide is reframed as resolve.

READ: Trump responds to Iran’s Khamenei, expressing hope to make deal

Trump has extended this logic to the global economy. Tariffs are imposed not as instruments of international commercial strategy, but as weapons of coercion. Allies, rivals, and neutral states are subjected to the same pressure. The outcome is not leverage, but fragmentation. Supply chains convulse. Markets recoil. Trust erodes.

American economists have repeatedly warned of this. Nobel laureate Paul Krugman has argued that tariffs function as domestic taxes that make Americans poorer while offering only the illusion of strength. Former Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers has described trade wars against allies as “self-inflicted wounds” that undermine US credibility and accelerate strategic decline. These are not partisan attacks. They are economic assessments.

The most telling response, however, has come not from Washington, but from abroad. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney did not pivot toward Beijing out of ideological sympathy. He did so because unpredictability has become America’s defining export. At the World Economic Forum, Carney warned that in a fractured global order, middle powers face a stark choice: “If you’re not at the table, you’re on the menu.” His subsequent outreach to China reflected calculation, not defiance.

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer followed a similar path. When Trump warned that engaging China was “dangerous,” Starmer dismissed the warning and pursued trade talks anyway, signalling a growing divergence between US pressure and European economic reality. China, meanwhile, waits.

President Xi Jinping does not trade insults or issue threats on social media. He offers principles that double as strategy. “Trade wars have no winners,” Xi has said repeatedly — a statement less moral than diagnostic. Every tariff imposed on an ally, every insult delivered to a partner, weakens the coalition that once constrained Chinese power. Trump’s onslaught fractures American gravity. China absorbs the benefit.

READ: Iran plans to hold joint naval drills with China, Russia in northern Indian Ocean region: Report

This is how powerful nations lose allies. Not through sudden defeat, but through accumulated arrogance. Trump believes power is demonstrated through disruption. In reality, power is measured by what others are willing to endure for you. Increasingly, the answer is: very little. The United States is not being driven toward confrontation with China. It is being driven toward isolation from its own alliances. US observers warn that the US is shifting from being a system-builder to a system-spoiler. Trump’s supporters mistake this for sovereignty. It is abandonment.

History shows that great powers often commit self-inflicting wounds, long before they wither and collapse. They hollow out institutions, reward spectacle over competence, and replace moral language with brute assertion. Trump did not start this malaise. But he has given it its most reckless expression.

A bull in a chinaware shop does not need intent. Destruction is inevitable. What matters is not how loudly it charges, but what remains standing after it leaves. Using his trademark wit to warn the administration against following through on aggressive rhetoric regarding the Arctic territory, Senator John Kennedy (R-Louisiana) summed it best when he said, “To invade Greenland and attack its sovereignty, a fellow NATO country, would be weapons-grade stupid. President Trump is not weapons-grade stupid,” in an interview with CNN in January 2026. 

China, meanwhile, does not respond in kind. It does not shout, threaten, or posture. President Xi Jinping offers no insults and no theatrics. He waits. When he says that “trade wars have no winners,” it is not a plea for cooperation but a diagnosis of American self-harm. Beijing understands that Trump’s belligerence fractures the very alliances that once constrained Chinese power. Every tariff imposed on an ally, every partner publicly humiliated, accelerates America’s strategic loneliness. Xi does not need to confront the United States. He allows it to erode itself. He sits patiently waiting for the apple to fall into his lap.

OPINION: The armada and the trigger: How the US-Iran standoff could ignite a regional catastrophe

The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Monitor.