clear

Creating new perspectives since 2009

Could Israel aid mission open the door to renewed Venezuela-Israel relations?

July 5, 2026 at 6:25 pm

An Israeli aid delegation has arrived Venezuela, July2026. [photo source: circulated through platforms]

Listen
0:00 / 0:00
1.0x
Ready

The arrival of an Israeli aid delegation from the humanitarian organization NATAN in Venezuela, following the powerful earthquakes that struck the country on 24th June, has triggered political controversy, particularly after images circulated showing members of the team wearing military uniforms and carrying the Israeli flag.

The deployment is notable because Venezuela has had no formal diplomatic relations with Israel since 2009. Caracas has also been among the most prominent political and diplomatic supporters of South Africa’s case against Israel at the International Court of Justice, where Israel is accused of committing genocide in the Gaza Strip.

“Immediately after landing, the delegation members began a series of working meetings with local authorities, emergency services and other partners to assess the situation, identify needs on the ground, plan joint activity and finalize preparations for the start of operations,” Israel Defense Forces (IDF) and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a joint statement.

The Venezuelan government sought to present the Israeli team’s arrival as part of a technical emergency response. Delcy Rodríguez, who replaced former President Nicolás Maduro after he was abducted by the U.S, said she had been informed of the arrival of one of the Israeli experts, accompanied by Rabbi Cohen, a representative of Venezuela’s Jewish community. She said the specialists would assess technical conditions in the affected areas and identify the rescue work needed before any reconstruction process could begin.

“We received a highly specialised and professional team from Israel, coordinated through the Jewish community in Venezuela. I thank Rabbi Bowen for helping us contact the Israeli government. The team has begun working with Venezuelan authorities to assess damaged infrastructure and determine whether there are survivors or bodies under the rubble”, Delcy said.

“Although Venezuela does not have diplomatic relations with some countries, they are here with us, and the Venezuelan people deeply appreciate this assistance”, she added.

Hebrew-language media reported signs of improving relations after 17 years of estrangement, following Venezuelan Vice President Delcy Rodríguez’s public thanks to the Israeli rescue and relief team that arrived to assist after the earthquakes.

The deployment has opened a broader debate over the line between humanitarian engagement and political messaging. Supporters argue that disaster response should be separated from diplomatic disputes and that medical assistance can create rare channels of human contact in politically closed environments. Critics, however, may view such missions as an attempt to improve Israel’s international image, especially when uniformed military personnel are visible in a country officially hostile to Israel’s policies.

Alice Miller, executive director of NATAN, said the organization’s priority is medical and humanitarian rather than political.

“When a disaster of this magnitude occurs, there is no time to lose,” Miller said. “Twenty years of experience have taught us that the first few hours are crucial, both medically and psychologically.”

“We didn’t arrive first with flags,” she said. “We arrived with medicine, listening and respect. That is often the most effective form of diplomacy.”

The writer and political analyst Sayid Marcos Tenorio said the Israeli mission should not be viewed only through a humanitarian lens, arguing that state-backed relief operations often carry political value in international relations.

“In international relations, humanitarian missions promoted by states are rarely politically neutral,” Tenorio told MEMO. “Beyond assisting victims, they also function as instruments of soft power and diplomatic projection.”

He said the Venezuelan case carries particular symbolism because Caracas broke relations with Israel in 2009 in solidarity with the Palestinian people. According to Tenorio, that context makes the Israeli delegation’s arrival politically significant, regardless of the stated humanitarian objective.

“In Venezuela’s case, the symbolism is even greater because this is a country that severed relations with Israel in solidarity with the Palestinian people,” he said. “An Israeli mission represents much more than humanitarian aid. It creates an opportunity to open political channels where formal diplomacy has remained closed for nearly two decades.”

Tenorio argued that every humanitarian operation produces political effects, including institutional contact, trust-building and reputational gains. He said this dimension is especially relevant for Israel amid growing international criticism over the war in Gaza.

“The aid may be real, but it also forms part of a strategy of informal diplomacy and rebuilding international legitimacy,” he said.

Tenorio said the central issue is not whether Israeli doctors or experts should help Venezuelan victims, but whether the mission also serves Israel’s broader image-management objectives.

“Medicine should serve humanity, not diplomacy,” he said. “The issue is not an Israeli doctor treating a Venezuelan victim. The issue is a state facing accusations of genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity in Gaza seeking to build a humanitarian image abroad.”

He added that humanitarian credibility depends on consistency. “There is a deep contradiction between claiming solidarity in Venezuela while destroying hospitals, schools and civilian infrastructure in Palestine,” Tenorio said. “Humanitarian credibility depends on consistency between rhetoric and practice.”

“True humanitarianism is universal and consistent,” he said. “It cannot be selective, nor can it coexist with policies of occupation, blockade, collective punishment or the systematic destruction of civilian populations.”

For Tenorio, “The only answer can be absolute transparency, Who is funding the mission? Who is coordinating it? What is the role of the military? What information is being produced? Who is supervising the activities?”

He warned that without clear answers, the mission is likely to be seen not only as emergency assistance, but also as part of a broader strategic effort. “Without full transparency, it is inevitable that the assistance will also be perceived as an instrument of strategic diplomacy and as part of an effort to rebuild the Israeli state’s international image,” he said.

Despite speculation that the Israeli mission could mark an opening in Venezuela-Israel relations, Tenorio said one humanitarian deployment is unlikely to reverse nearly two decades of Bolivarian foreign policy.

“I do not believe that a humanitarian mission, on its own, can alter a policy built over nearly two decades,” he said. “Support for Palestine has been a principle of Bolivarian foreign policy since Hugo Chávez and has been maintained by Nicolás Maduro.”

Still, he said the mission may fit into a wider Israeli effort to reduce its diplomatic isolation in Latin America. “It is clear that Israel is seeking to reduce its political isolation in Latin America,” Tenorio said. “Initiatives of this nature may be part of a broader strategy to rebuild ties with governments in the region.”

BLOG: Chile establishes senate friendship group to strengthen historic ties with Palestine

The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Monitor.