The China paradox: A giant built on cracked foundations

For three decades, the West told itself a comforting story about China. Admit it into the global trading system, the theory went, and market forces would do the rest: prosperity would breed a middle class, and a middle class would eventually demand a political voice. Beijing joined the World Trade Organization in 2001 on that assumption. Twenty-five years later, the assumption looks like one of the great strategic misreadings of the post-Cold War era. China gained unrestricted access to Western markets. It never opened its own on comparable terms, and it never loosened the Communist Party’s grip on the economy or the state. 

None of this means China’s rise is a mirage. It is not. China builds infrastructure at a pace no democracy can match, dominates manufacturing in electric vehicles, solar panels, robotics and telecoms, and in select fields of artificial intelligence, it now competes with or leads the United States.

Huawei alone proves that Chinese engineering can be genuinely world-class. But scale is not the same as strength, and growth is not the same as health. Underneath the impressive statistics sits an economy that runs on debt, propped up by a state that prizes control over efficiency and cannot admit failure without threatening its own legitimacy.

The Numbers Problem

Start with the headline figure. Beijing’s official growth target for 2026 sits at 4.5 to 5 percent, already the lowest target China has set since the early 1990s. The first half of the year came in at 4.7 percent, with growth actually slowing to 4.3 percent in the second quarter as household consumption stayed weak and the property sector kept dragging on the wider economy. Independent analysts have long argued the real figure sits well below what Beijing publishes, and China’s own statisticians have quietly acknowledged inconsistent data reporting methodology in official releases. Whatever the precise number, the direction is unmistakable: deceleration, not the resilience state media keeps promising.

The debt behind that growth is the deeper story. Chinese state banks operate as an arm of Communist Party strategy, not as independent lenders judging risk and return. Sectors the Party favors receive open-ended credit regardless of profitability, which is how electric vehicle makers can sell cars below cost for years and keep operating. Railways lose money. Airlines lose money. None of it matters if the banking system, which the Party effectively owns outright, keeps the credit flowing. This is not capitalism producing winners. It is politics producing output.

READ: Xi backs Mideast countries in building new security architecture, urges no marginalization of Palestine

Two Bubbles, One Cause

The real estate crash exposed how thin the foundation really was. For a generation, property was the one asset Chinese households trusted, the closest thing to a guaranteed store of value in a country with a weak social safety net.

Developers borrowed against that trust, built far beyond genuine demand, and collapsed when the buying finally stopped. The state, tellingly, did not step in to rescue them the way it protects favored state enterprises.

Millions of families who had prepaid for apartments that were never finished lost their savings outright. The damage shows up today in anemic consumer spending: Chinese households, having watched their primary asset evaporate, are simply not buying.

The second bubble is demographic, and it may prove harder to fix than any property market. China recorded just 7.92 million births in 2025, the lowest count since 1949, while deaths topped 11 million, meaning the population is now shrinking by more than three million people a year. The fertility rate has fallen to roughly 1.0 births per woman, deep in territory usually associated with acute national crisis rather than gradual decline. Cash subsidies and extended parental leave have not moved the needle, because the underlying calculation for young Chinese couples is economic: a weak welfare state means each couple expects to support two sets of aging parents with little institutional help, making children look like a cost few can justify.

WATCH: Podcast by Jasim Al-Azzawi with Dr. Djavad Salehi Isfahni: US Plan: Financial Strangulation and Internal Implosion

Control Over Efficiency

None of this is really a mystery to Beijing. China scholar Minxin Pei has spent years asking essentially one question about the country’s political system: is its authoritarian resilience a lasting feature, or simply a phase? The honest answer, drawn from Xi Jinping’s own governing choices, is that the Party will always choose control over efficiency, even when that trade-off produces bad loans, empty apartment blocks, and unprofitable national champions. Self-preservation, not GDP, is the Party’s actual mandate. A system built on that priority is not necessarily fragile in the short run. But it is brittle in the way authoritarian systems tend to be strong until, quite suddenly, they aren’t.

Washington’s Absent Strategy

None of these vulnerabilities has produced a coherent American response.

The Biden administration attempted to build coalitions among advanced democracies to counterbalance Beijing. The Trump administration has shown little interest in that kind of alliance-based approach, leaving Washington without a unified China strategy at precisely the moment China’s internal weaknesses are becoming harder to hide.

Meanwhile, Beijing continues exporting its overcapacity, flooding foreign markets with underpriced goods that keep Chinese factories running while quietly undermining industries abroad.

China’s leadership still speaks with total confidence that history is on its side, that the “Middle Kingdom” is simply resuming its rightful place while American power fades. It may be years, even decades, before the debt, the demographic collapse, and the real estate wreckage force a reckoning.

But a country that must dispute its own growth figures, subsidize its own exports, and pay its own citizens to have children is not a country writing the next chapter of history from a position of strength. It is a country buying time.

OPINION: Operation Economic Outcast: Washington swaps missiles for money, but the math still doesn’t add up

The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Monitor.