clear

Creating new perspectives since 2009

Egyptian academic:'Sentences are a tool to settle political disagreements'

May 21, 2015 at 3:09 pm

Emad Shahin is the editor-in-chief of The Oxford Encyclopedia of Islam and Politics and a professor of public policy. On Saturday, he was sentenced in absentia to death by an Egyptian court in the case where he was accused of colluding with Iran and the Palestinian group Hamas to destabilise Egypt. In a statement, he denounced the verdict as a “travesty of justice”. Shahin currently lives in the US and is visiting professor at Georgetown University’s School of Foreign Service.

Following the verdict Shahin released the following statement on his website:

In another travesty of justice, an Egyptian court today issued a mass death sentence against more than 120 defendants in two cases known as the “Grand Espionage” and “Prisons Break”. I was falsely charged in the first case and I received the death sentence in absentia pending referral to the mufti. I repeat my absolute rejection of the charges against me and note that I am hardly the only victim of injustice in this case. Furthermore, I condemn the sham trials engulfing Egypt since July 2013 where wholesale death sentences on flimsy or no evidence have been the mark of the current military regime.

In fact, these sentences are yet another manifestation of the deeply troubling way the Egyptian judiciary has been used as a tool to settle political disagreements by the harshest and most repressive means possible. Due process, regard for evidence, and minimum standard of justice have been tossed aside in favor of draconian injustice. Ironically, two defendants sentenced to death today had already been dead and one has been in prison for the past 19 years. Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and many other human rights organisations have condemned the way the Egyptian Judiciary has been used to settle political scores.

The military-backed regime has been targeting peaceful opponents, young protesters, students, journalists and academics. It is currently seeking to reconstitute the security state and intimidate all opponents. For over two years, the army and security agencies have staged a counter-revolution against all those associated with January 25th Revolution, combatting the aspirations of Egyptians for building a free and democratic society. Agencies that are supposed to serve the people are instead oppressing them.

As an independent academic and scholar, I will continue to uphold and defend democratic values, human rights and national reconciliation. These are the exact values that Egypt needs at the moment to chart a peaceful course in the future. I believe this is the essence of why I was targeted and what my case is all about.

Emad Shahin, Ph.D.