Espanol / English

Middle East Near You

New French president ‘will not recognise Palestine’

Emmanuel Macron makes a speech after winning the 2017 French election at the Esplanade du Louvre in Paris, France on May 07, 2017 [Mustafa Yalçın/Anadolu Agency]
Emmanuel Macron makes a speech after winning the 2017 French election at the Esplanade du Louvre in Paris, France on May 07, 2017 [Mustafa Yalçın/Anadolu Agency]

Newly elected French President Emmanuel Macron has reiterated that he will not recognise Palestine as a state as it would hinder good relations between Israel and France

Prior to his election win, Macron said he backs a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and that recognising Palestine would cause instability and he would not risk France’s relationship with Israel to serve the Palestinian agenda. At a political rally Macron said:

Unilateral recognition of Palestine, right now, will undermine stability,

That’s right. France’s new liberal president would rather maintain good relations with Israel than recognize “Palestine.”

French Jews may have voted en masse for Emmanuel Macron in the final round of France’s presidential elections, but that doesn’t make him their dream president.

Like many other supporters of the 39-year-old former investment banker, who became the youngest French president in recent history, Jews voted for Macron mainly to block his far-right opponent, Marine Le Pen. The centrist won with 65 percent of the vote, to 34 percent for Le Pen.

Categories
Europe & RussiaFranceMiddle EastNewsPalestine
  • peepsqueek

    France’s chief rabbi joined Muslim and Christian faith leaders in the endorsement of Macron against Le Pen. Macron said he would not recognize Palestine when he was running for President. He said that recognizing them would cause destabilization and more sectarian conflict. La Penn is anti Islam, and left-wing candidate for France’s presidency Jean-Luc Mélenchon says he would back sanctions on Israel. So be happy with Macron!

  • Dominic Blais

    sounds like france still elected a zionazi

    • peepsqueek

      That was ignorant!

      • Pop_Korn

        No it wasn’t.

        • peepsqueek

          Palestinian Arabs have applied for UN statehood via the same path they have rejected for Israel all these years. Throwing names at the problem is just plain ignorant.

          • Pop_Korn

            No wonder you hide behind a private screen. The Palestinians are in Palestine, their homeland, The Khazarian Ashkenazis are invaders.

          • Helen4Yemen

            Perfect!

          • peepsqueek

            Palestinian Arabs and Jews have to have a separate State as described in the 1947 UN Partition Resolution. Pan-Arabists and Islamists believe that the banner of Islam must fly over every inch of the land . If your primary concern is for all indigenous people ——

            Assyrian International News Agency (AINA}:
”Keep in mind that these Christian minorities, the Assyrians, Armenians, Copts, are actually the original inhabitants of these areas with roots going back thousands of years before Christianity. What we’re seeing is a systematic attempt to cleanse the Middle East of its original inhabitants, this is a continuation of the genocide that took place in Ottoman Turkey in 1915.”

            Coptic News: 
”Since Christianity came to Egypt in 57 A.D., we, the Christians of Egypt, have not had conflict with the Jewish people. Copts have been a marginal population held in captivity for sixteen centuries. We constitute the largest non-Arab, non-Moslem minority in the Middle East. The Church of Alexandria, is one of the oldest organizations in the Middle East. Despite this distinguished history, it is a church that has been under siege since the Islamic invasion.”

            Kurd Net Daily Online News: 
”For years the 30 million Kurds spread across those territories have been the world’s largest ethnic group without an independent homeland. Only the Kurds in Iraq, who displaced Iraqi forces in the 1990s when a U.S. and British no-fly zone was in place against Saddam Hussein, have managed to carved out an area of real autonomy.”

            THE 25 million Berbers, the indigenous people of North Africa, also known as Amazighs meaning “the freeborn”, are descended from the pre-Arab inhabitants of north Africa west of the Nile river. Their culture and language, along with those of other minorities, have long been suppressed by Arab elites, who imposed a policy of Arabisation after these North African Countries became independent “Arab” States, all belonging to the League of “Arab” Nations.

          • Mike Abramov

            Mr. Pop_Korn – you have immediately invalidated your argument by suggesting that the Jews of Europe came from Kazaria. This is historically totally wrong. The Kingdom of Kazaria only lasted 200 years from circa: 800 AD to 1000 AD. The vast majority of Jews lived in France, Germany Poland, and the Ukraine.until the 18th century when Russia engulfed half of Europe and the Habsburgs engulfed the other half.

            If you don’t believe me, check the history books.

          • neluroman

            Seriously!!! Can you name a Palestinian king or queen? Palestinians are a recent ‘invented ” people with no any historical roots. That doesn’t mean that now the Palestinians could not have a country of their own. Yes, but how big, that is the question. It should not be forgotten that the most part of the historical Palestine went to Jordan, back in 1948. And what remained from Palestine land must be divided between Palestinians and Israelis taking into accont the Israelis’ claims, and the fact that the Israelis are the winners of the Arab-Israeli wars, wars fought over the un-distributed ( at that very time) land of Palestine.

          • Vikas Sood

            Haha. What funny logic..

          • neluroman

            I think it is better to be funny than inexistent,

          • Mahomed Hameed

            So if I fight you and win you think I’m entitled to steal more land? Do you know about international treaties on occupation?
            You must be some stupid historical reader if you forget that in 1948 the Balfour Declaration started an exodus of Zionists from all over the world to Palestine.
            Over 700, 000 Palestinians were displaced, who cannot return despite the UN resolutions. Zionists are in contravention of over 60 UN resolutions.
            Leave history this is happening now-the starling as we speak.
            So do me favour. Buy a house. I’ll fight and defeat you and occupy it for ever, throwing you out because I defeated you!
            What paltry logic for this age!
            Unbelievable!

          • neluroman

            Wow! Incredibly! I am sorry to say it, but you have a deformed perception of the historical reality of Palestine. Therefore my friend, let me correct your perception of the events that have occurred in Palestine along the history, a very short resume, of course. It was once upon time a people, the Jews, who conquered the land of Palestine. Of yes, this conquest was not moral by our standards, but for that time it was rather the norm than something out of normal – the mighty of your army was your main argument in that times.
            They , the Jews, built there, over a period of many centuries, not one but three functional states, Israel, Judah and Samaria, and one of the most brilliant city in the world ( at that time) Jerusalem. Then a more powerful empire, the Roman Empire, chassed them out from their land and destroyed their state. But not all Jews left, some remained accepting the rules imposed by Romans. Then the Roman Empire, like any other empire, collapsed and a lot of other peoples conquered the land: Arabs, Persians, Christians, Mamelukes and Ottomans. During those times were a lot “ins and outs ” for the Palestinian land, there were no restrictions in this sense. So, we are in the year 1918, The Ottoman Empire, the last conquerer of the Palestine, has just collapsed letting behind a land of Palestine populated by at least two distinct groups of people, Jews and Arabs, who were fighting ones others for the right of having a state of their own in Palestine. The Europeans, who in the wake of the Ottoman Empire’s collapse had self-appointed themselves as ” the protectors of Palestine, ” decided to intervene to stop the bloodshed. Here is, approximately, how the discuss unfolded :The 1st European: ” To stop the bloodshed we have to divide the land of Palestine between Arabs and Jews.” The 2end European: “Yes, this is a must. These two distinct groups of people have been living in Palestine for centuries, and, as the reality has proved so many times in the last years, they cannot live side by side on equal terms in the same country. “. The 4th European ( the British representant): The Arabs are more numerous, so they have the right to 2/3 of Palestine”. A vote followed and the state of Jordan was created. Another European:”And now the rest of Palestine goes to Jews, right?” The French representant: “No, not exactly. There is a group of people, self-appointed Palestinians, who even if are identical to Arabs, still they pretend to be different. Let’s give them a country too.” Another European: ” The Jews are more numerous in these areas, so let’s give them 2/3 from what remained, and make Jerusalem an open city, a possible capital for both Jews and Palestinians.” A vote ensued and the premises for creating Israel and Palestine were created. I have to mention here that while the Jews proceeded with all what was need to create Israel, thus accepting partition, the Arabs rejected it and did nothing for creating a Palestinian state. Seduced by the slogan, ” 1.3 billion Arabs cannot bow to a few millions of Jews,” they chose to go to war against the new formed state of Israel. But, to anyone surprise, they lost the war against the Jews as they lost the subsequent three other wars. In these conditions the international laws are clear: ” If a territory is under an international mandate- as it was the case with Palestine- and yet to be devided between two parts ( in this case the parts being Palestinians and Jews), and a part goes to war against the other part ( the Arabs went to war against the Jews) and lose the war, then that part loses also any right over the disputed territory”. That is crystal clear, there is nothing to comment on, the law is law and the logic is logic. In such cases the loser must accept its fate and move on. Mahomed Hameed, you are right, more than 700, 000 Palestinians were displaced and, for the most of them, that was tantamount to turning them into refugees. Yes, but at the same time more than 400,000 Jews were also turned into refugees, as the leaders of the Middle East countries, where they had been living for centuries, told them unceremoniously: ” Disappear from here! You are more welcomed here. Go to Israel your new home!” Of course, they were forced to leave with no else than their personal belongings. And, I am sure you know it, no one was ever paid any compensation for the wealth they left behind. Is that right? India and Pakistan also changed terrotories and people. And refugees with nothing else than their belongings were on the both parts. Thus the Palestinan refugees were not the only ones in the world to endure such a sad fate, neither were the Jews, of course. Of yeah, this is not something the world should be proud of, but…. During the World War II one of my grandmothers became a refugee too. In 1944 she left Moldova and never saw it again. And of course, no Russian paid her ever any compensations. So… that was, she moved on and got another life.
            Mahomed Hameed, what I said here is not an academic essey, but rather something said from a common people to a common people. If you accept it, good. If you don’t, that is fine with me too.

          • Dominic Blais

            that is not a name it is a proper definition

          • Pop_Korn

            Good one!

          • peepsqueek

            Just for balance, we have to use the term Islamo-fascism to describe Islamism, political Islam and Islamic Sharia.

            All the Countries of the Middle East, to include the Palestinian territory, with exception of Israel, are signatories to the Cairo Declaration of Human Rights:

            Article 19: “There shall be NO crime or punishment EXCEPT as provided for in the Sharia.”

            Article 24: “All the rights and freedoms stipulated in this Declaration are subject to the Islamic Sharia.”

            Article 25: “The Islamic Sharia is the ONLY source of reference for the explanation or clarification of ANY of the articles of this Declaration.”

          • Helen4Yemen

            Amazing that you are comparing the natives with the
            snow-white-Ashenanzi from Lithuania, Poland Germany, Hungary.

          • peepsqueek

            Jews of Europe, Middle East, and North Africa needed to have a tiny Jewish State and develop a nation capable of protecting Jews everywhere. The banner of Islam now flies over 99.9% of the Middle East land mass, and you are just pissssed that it is not 100%

          • Helen4Yemen

            Is Palestine the snow-white-Ashkenazi grandmother’s land? Yes or no?

          • peepsqueek

            Of course, as three generations of children born, raised, and built a nation on their holiest sites and around their holiest City.

          • Helen4Yemen

            When snow-white Ashkenazi arrived in 1882 as a Zionist, how many snow-white Ashkenazi had ever lived on that land?

          • peepsqueek

            The first enduring Jewish agricultural settlement in the Modern Palestine was not founded by European refugees, but by a group of old-time families, leaving the overcrowded Jewish Quarter of the Old City of Jerusalem. According to the Turkish census of 1875, by that time Jews already constituted a majority of the population of Jerusalem and by 1905 comprised two-thirds of its citizens. The Encyclopedia Britanica of 1910 gives the population figure as 60,000, of who 40,000 were Jews. Your problem is that you omit too much of history for convenience.

          • Helen4Yemen

            How many generations do you think the French produced in Algeria in 132 years and the British in Aden in 160 year? Where are all the new generations? GONE!

          • peepsqueek

            Gone to a waiting homeland! Greeks and Romans built and lived in Alexandria Egypt for a thousand years, before the Arab invasions. Romans built and lived Tirpolitania/Libya for over 500 years before the Arab invasions. Egyptians/Copts and Berbers, going back thousands of years before the Arab invasions, both have to live under Arab Authority and Islamic Sharia.

          • Helen4Yemen

            Which one of these countries will refuse to admit back their Jewish citizens?

            Poland, Belarus, Ukraine, Russia, Hungary, Germany, Lithuania, Latvia, Slovakia, Romania, Bosnia, Serbia, Estonia?

          • peepsqueek

            How many want to return to the ashes of their families and friends, destroyed towns and villages. They have mostly moved on and gained respect through their achievements and accomplishments. Not one has gone back to blowup restaurants, public transportation, or crowded market places.

          • Helen4Yemen

            They moved on at the expense of others! As long as this snow-white European is not repatriated back home, expect no peace.

          • Helen4Yemen

            Guess what? The first time ever they started to blow up places was as a result of the seizure of their land by the snow-white man from Lithuania, Poland, Hungary, Germany …

          • Vikas Sood

            Are you talking about groper Trump zilla?

          • peepsqueek

            How is that relevant to Helen’s question or my answer? Please be very specific

          • peepsqueek

            What happened to the native Jews of Yemen, Morocco, Egypt, Arabia, Iraq, etc??? Even the Kurdish Jews of Iraq moved to Israel for self preservation. You omit far to much of history to consider yourself objective.

          • Helen4Yemen

            Why do you call them “Palestinian Arabs”? What else are Palestinians but Arabs? It is redundant. We do not say, ‘Yemeni Arabs” or “Egyptian Arabs”, do we?

          • peepsqueek

            There are no more Egyptians, Egyptian culture, or Egyptian language, since the Arab Islamic invasions.
            Coptic News: 
”Since Christianity came to Egypt in 57 A.D., we, the Christians of Egypt, have not had conflict with the Jewish people. Copts have been a marginal population held in captivity for sixteen centuries. We constitute the largest non-Arab, non-Moslem minority in the Middle East. The Church of Alexandria, is one of the oldest organizations in the Middle East. Despite this distinguished history, it is a church that has been under siege since the Islamic invasion.”

            In 1922, the government of Yemen reintroduced an ancient Islamic law requiring that Jewish orphans under age 12 be forcibly converted to Islam.

            In 1947, after the UN Partition Resolution vote, Muslim rioters, joined by the local police force, engaged in a bloody pogrom in Aden that killed 82 Jews and destroyed hundreds of Jewish homes. Aden’s Jewish community was economically paralyzed, as most of the Jewish stores and businesses were destroyed. They were not European Jews. Why do you always omit so much from Middle East history?

            This increasingly targeting of Jews led to the emigration of virtually the entire Yemenite Jewish community – almost 50,000 – between June 1949 and September 1950 in Operation “Magic Carpet.” A smaller, continuous migration was allowed to continue into 1962, when a civil war put an halt to any further Jewish exodus.

            Until 1976, when an American diplomat came across a small Jewish community in a remote region of northern Yemen, it was believed the Yemenite Jewish community was extinct. As a result, the plight of Yemenite Jews went unrecognized by the outside world. Nineteen of the last remaining Jews in Yemen were airlifted to Israel on March 21, 2016, by the Jewish Agency. The secret operation, which rescued all but 50 Yemeni Jews.

          • Helen4Yemen

            GOOGLE THESE STORIES

            What happened to the thousands of stolen Yemeni babies?
            1994 Yemeni Jews describe their holocaust, how Ashkenazi Europeans stole 4,500 children from immigrants ( The Independent )
            1997 Daughter Learns Of Stolen Past, Reopening An Israeli Mystery. A Family Reunion And New Questions ( Philly dot com )
            1998 The Case of a Missing Children Part Five: Sold? ( Iisraelbehindthenews .com )
            2010 ISRAEL: THE DEVIL’S BEST FRIEND? ( Disclose tv )
            2011 A Mystery That Defies Solution ( Haaretz )
            2013 Uzi Meshulam, Who Campaigned to Probe Disappearance of Yemenite Children, Dies at 60 ( Haaretz )
            2014 The tragedy of the lost Yemenite children: In the footsteps of the adoptees ( 972mag )
            2015 Yemenite Children Affair: Families of the kidnapped speak out ( 972mag )
            2016 Israel’s stolen children of Yemen ( TheJewishstar )
            2016 Israel may soon shed light on ‘stolen babies’ mystery ( Al-Monitor )
            2016 ‘Yemenite children affair’ awakens ( IJN )
            2016 Hundreds of Yemenite Children Were Abducted in State’s Early Years, Says Israeli Cabinet Minister ( Haaretz )
            2016 Wounds over missing Yemenite children open, MKs renew push for truth ( Aljazeera )
            2016 The Babies From Yemen: An Enduring Mystery ( Nytimes )
            2016 A 70-year-old mystery: Yemeni Jews say young relatives were stolen in Israel ( TimesofIsrael )
            2016 The shocking story of Israel’s disappeared babies ( Washingtonposy )
            2016 Israel’s Stolen Babies: Shocking Story of a Decades-old Secret ( Telesurtv )
            2016 Israel’s Stolen Babies Remains the State’s Darkest Secret ( Globalresearch )

          • evsw

            peepsqueek is a ‘Hasbara’ troll. Don’t waste your energy trying to rationalise with that bigoted prat.

      • Dominic Blais

        it will never compare with your ignorance and love of fascist neoliberals like macron

        • peepsqueek

          I have no great love for Macron, just love of the facts and choices. You want to see the banner of Islamic fly over every inch of the Middle East land mass, without regard of all the non-Arab and non-Muslims that do not have the full right of self determination. I support Israel’s right to defend herself against those that want to see the banner of Islam and the Pan-Arab colors of the former Caliphates fly over Jerusalem, while all other faiths are still forbidden in the whole of Saudi Arabia to this day, May 22, 2017.

    • Vikas Sood

      He is a well known roth-childer puppet and did drama of leaks just before polling. Public thought it”s Russians.

  • Eric Bolt

    Cabal terrorist, will only let a seasoned prepared trained Snake, lead any of their Interest -! Removing the Cabal terrorist from Gov is the only chance we have left and they know [IT]

    • peepsqueek

      “the only chance we have left” – Is that why the banner of Islam flies over 99.9% of the Middle East land mass, and have to deal with the brain drain of people with a post secondary education leaving for the West, along with those fleeing for their lives dictators and totalitarian governments and terrorism in the name of Islam?

      • Helen4Yemen

        The Iraq war and ‘Greater Israel

        Here is from Ari Shavit – Haaretz – March 4, 2003

        “In the course of the past year, a new belief has emerged in the town: the belief in war against Iraq. That ardent faith was disseminated by a small group of 25 or 30 neoconservatives, almost all of them JEWISH, almost all of them intellectuals people who are mutual friends and cultivate one another and are convinced that political ideas are a major driving force of history
        a partial list:

        Richard Perle,
        Paul Wolfowitz,
        Douglas Feith,
        William Kristol,
        Eliot Abrams,
        Charles Krauthammer”

      • Helen4Yemen

        NO ISRAEL = NO IRAQ WAR

        NO IRAQ WAR = NO ISIS

        Carl Bernstein:

        We went to war against a guy who has absolutely nothing

        to do with 911. It was a total pretext. It is inexplicable. And

        there you go to Cheney, there you go to Bush, there you

        go to the Jewish neocons who wanted to remake the world

        – maybe I can say that because I am Jewish …

        https://www*youtube*com/watch?v=ZRlatDWqh0o

        Replace * with dot

        • peepsqueek

          On October 13, 1932, long before Israel, Iraq became a sovereign state, Iraq was admitted to the League of Nations. Iraq still was messed up by social, economic, ethnic, religious, and ideological conflicts, all of which retarded the process of state formation. The declaration of statehood and fixed boundaries triggered an intense competition for power. Sunnis and Shias, cities and tribes, sheiks and tribesmen, Assyrians and Kurds, pan-Arabists and Iraqi nationalists–all fought for places in the emerging state structure. Unable to establish deep roots, after the Ottomans, the British-imposed political system was overwhelmed by these conflicting sectarian demands. What has changed?

        • peepsqueek

          SECURITY COUNCIL HOLDS IRAQ IN ‘MATERIAL BREACH’ OF DISARMAMENT OBLIGATIONS, OFFERS FINAL CHANCE TO COMPLY, UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTING RESOLUTION 1441 (2002)

          Security Council Press Release
          4644th Meeting (AM)
          OFFERS FINAL CHANCE TO COMPLY, UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTING RESOLUTION 1441 (2002) Holding Iraq in “material breach” of its obligations under previous resolutions, the Security Council this morning decided to afford it a “final opportunity to comply” with its disarmament obligations, while setting up an enhanced inspection regime for full and verified completion of the disarmament process established by resolution 687 (1991). — (Saddam was in violation of 17 Security Council Resolutions since 1991)

          • Helen4Yemen

            Please do a find on “Shi’ite or Sunni” on this post. I have recreated the ODED-YINON PLAN here by selecting the parts that are relevant to current events such as Iraq, Iran, Syria, Egypt, and giving them headings to make them more interesting to read and grasp. The essence of the document is how to break up the Arab armies and countries so that the Jews now in Palestine will never have to face having to go back home like the French, the British, the Italians or the Crusaders. These colonists want to do all in their power so that they never would have to face a day where they may have to pack up and leave the area just like all the previous European colonial settlers like them had to vacate the area. All the turmoil we now see in the region has its roots due to the presence of these European Ashkenazi colonial settlers in Palestine. I provide the link for the document in its entirety at the bottom of the page, but reading what is posted here is sufficient. The document was written in 1982

            1- The Arab world is too fractured to pose a threat to the Jews in Palestine
            The Arab Moslem world, therefore, is not the major strategic problem which we shall face in the Eighties, despite the fact that it carries the main threat against Israel, due to its growing military might. This world, with its ethnic minorities, its factions and internal crises, which is astonishingly self-destructive, as we can see in Lebanon, in non-Arab Iran and now also in Syria, is unable to deal successfully with its fundamental problems and does not therefore constitute a real threat against the State of Israel in the long run, but only in the short run where its immediate military power has great import. In the long run, this world will be unable to exist within its present framework in the areas around us without having to go through genuine revolutionary changes.

            2- The Arab world is made up of ethnic groups hostile to one another
            The Moslem Arab World is built like a temporary house of cards put together by foreigners (France and Britain in the Nineteen Twenties), without the wishes and desires of the inhabitants having been taken into account. It was arbitrarily divided into 19 states, all made of combinations of minorities and ethnic groups which are hostile to one another, so that every Arab Moslem state nowadays faces ethnic social destruction from within, and in some a civil war is already raging.

            3- Algeria, Morocco,Tunisia are made up of Arabs and non-Arab Berbers
            Apart from Egypt, all the Maghreb states are made up of a mixture of Arabs and non-Arab Berbers. In Algeria there is already a civil war raging in the Kabile mountains between the two nations in the country. Morocco and Algeria are at war with each other over Spanish Sahara, in addition to the internal struggle in each of them. Militant Islam endangers the integrity of Tunisia and Qaddafi organizes wars which are destructive from the Arab point of view, from a country which is sparsely populated and which cannot become a powerful nation. That is why he has been attempting unifications in the past with states that are more genuine, like Egypt and Syria.

            4- Sudan is made up of four groups hostile to one another
            Sudan, the most torn apart state in the Arab Moslem world today is built upon four groups hostile to each other, an Arab Moslem Sunni minority which rules over a majority of non-Arab Africans, Pagans, and Christians.

            5- Egypt: Christian minority may want a state of their own
            In Egypt there is a Sunni Moslem majority facing a large minority of Christians which is dominant in upper Egypt: some 7 million of them, so that even Sadat, in his speech on May 8, expressed the fear that they will want a state of their own, something like a “second” Christian Lebanon in Egypt.

            6- Syria: Shia minority ruling over majority Sunni
            Syria is fundamentally no different from Lebanon except in the strong military regime which rules it. But the real civil war taking place nowadays between the Sunni majority and the Shi’ite Alawi ruling minority (a mere 12% of the population) testifies to the severity of the domestic trouble.

            7- Iraq: Sunni minority ruling over Shia majority – Kurdish minority will make it easy to break it up
            Iraq is, once again, no different in essence from its neighbors, although its majority is Shi’ite and the ruling minority Sunni. Sixty-five percent of the population has no say in politics, in which an elite of 20 percent holds the power. In addition there is a large Kurdish minority in the north, and if it weren’t for the strength of the ruling regime, the army and the oil revenues, Iraq’s future state would be no different than that of Lebanon in the past or of Syria today. The seeds of inner conflict and civil war are apparent today already, especially after the rise of Khomeini to power in Iran, a leader whom the Shi’ites in Iraq view as their natural leader.

            8- Bahrain, UAE, Oman: Sunni minority rules over Shia majority, Kuwait: 75% foreign, Saudi Arabia: 50% foreign
            All the Gulf principalities and Saudi Arabia are built upon a delicate house of sand in which there is only oil. In Kuwait, the Kuwaitis constitute only a quarter of the population. In Bahrain, the Shi’ites are the majority but are deprived of power. In the UAE, Shi’ites are once again the majority but the Sunnis are in power. The same is true of Oman and North Yemen. Even in the Marxist South Yemen there is a sizable Shi’ite minority. In Saudi Arabia half the population is foreign, Egyptian and Yemenite, but a Saudi minority holds power.

            9- Jordan: Palestinian majority ruled by Bedouin minority
            Jordan is in reality Palestinian, ruled by a Trans-Jordanian Bedouin minority, but most of the army and certainly the bureaucracy is now Palestinian. As a matter of fact Amman is as Palestinian as Nablus.

            10- Syrian army is Sunni, commander Shia; Iraqi army is Shia ruled by Sunni
            All of these countries have powerful armies, relatively speaking. But there is a problem there too. The Syrian army today is mostly Sunni with an Alawi officer corps, the Iraqi army Shi’ite with Sunni commanders. This has great significance in the long run, and that is why it will not be possible to retain the loyalty of the army for a long time except where it comes to the only common denominator: The hostility towards Israel, and today even that is insufficient.

            11- Iran is composed of Sunni, Shia Alawis, Sunni Kurds, it faces Ethnic and religious tension,
            Half of Iran’s population is comprised of a Persian speaking group and the other half of an ethnically Turkish group. Turkey’s population comprises a Turkish Sunni Moslem majority, some 50%, and two large minorities, 12 million Shi’ite Alawis and 6 million Sunni Kurds.

            12- Afghanistan: 33% Shia, 67% Sunni
            In Afghanistan there are 5 million Shi’ites who constitute one third of the population.

            13- Pakistan: 15 million Shia (1982 figures)
            In Sunni Pakistan there are 15 million Shi’ites who endanger the existence of that state.

            14- The Muslim world made up of ethnic minorities is like a house of cards
            This national ethnic minority picture extending from Morocco to India and from Somalia to Turkey points to the absence of stability and a rapid degeneration in the entire region. When this picture is added to the economic one, we see how the entire region is built like a house of cards, unable to withstand its severe problems.

            15- Jews should have given Jordan to Palestinians and removed them from Palestine
            We could have saved ourselves all the bitter and dangerous conflict since then if we had given Jordan to the Palestinians who live west of the Jordan river. By doing that we would have neutralized the Palestinian problem which we nowadays face, and to which we have found solutions that are really no solutions at all, such as territorial compromise or autonomy which amount, in fact, to the same thing. Today, we suddenly face immense opportunities for transforming the situation thoroughly and this we must do in the coming decade, otherwise we shall not survive as a state.

            16- Jews should never have lost the Sinai peninsula
            The loss of the Suez Canal oil fields, of the immense potential of the oil, gas and other natural resources in the Sinai peninsula which is geomorphologically identical to the rich oil-producing countries in the region, will result in an energy drain in the near future and will destroy our domestic economy: one quarter of our present GNP as well as one third of the budget is used for the purchase of oil. The search for raw materials in the Negev and on the coast will not, in the near future, serve to alter that state of affairs. (Regaining) the Sinai peninsula with its present and potential resources is therefore a political priority which is obstructed by the Camp David and the peace agreements. The fault for that lies of course with the present Israeli government and the governments which paved the road to the policy of territorial compromise, the Alignment governments since 1967.

            17- Hoping for Egypt to give Israel the excuse to start a war and take back Sinai.
            Israel has two major routes through which to realize this purpose, one direct and the other indirect. The direct option is the less realistic one because of the nature of the regime and government in Israel as well as the wisdom of Sadat who obtained our withdrawal from Sinai, which was, next to the war of 1973, his major achievement since he took power. Israel will not unilaterally break the treaty, neither today, nor in 1982, unless it is very hard pressed economically and politically and Egypt provides Israel with the excuse to take the Sinai back into our hands for the fourth time in our short history. What is left therefore, is the indirect option. The economic situation in Egypt, the nature of the regime and its pan-Arab policy, will bring about a situation after April 1982 in which Israel will be forced to act directly or indirectly in order to regain control over Sinai as a strategic, economic and energy reserve for the long run. Egypt does not constitute a military strategic problem due to its internal conflicts and it could be driven back to the post 1967 war situation in no more than one day.

            18- How to break up Egypt
            Breaking Egypt down territorially into distinct geographical regions is the political aim of Israel in the Nineteen Eighties on its Western front. Egypt is divided and torn apart into many foci of authority. If Egypt falls apart, countries like Libya, Sudan or even the more distant states will not continue to exist in their present form and will join the downfall and dissolution of Egypt. The vision of a Christian Coptic State in Upper Egypt alongside a number of weak states with very localized power and without a centralized government as to date, is the key to a historical development which was only set back by the peace agreement but which seems inevitable in the long run.

            19- Break up Lebanon into five provinces
            Lebanon’s total dissolution into five provinces serves as a precendent for the entire Arab world including Egypt, Syria, Iraq and the Arabian peninsula and is already following that track.

            20- How to break up Syria and Iraq into ethnic and religious components
            The dissolution of Syria and Iraq later on into ethnically or religiously unqiue areas such as in Lebanon, is Israel’s primary target on the Eastern front in the long run, while the dissolution of the military power of those states serves as the primary short term target. Syria will fall apart, in accordance with its ethnic and religious structure, into several states such as in present day Lebanon, so that there will be a Shi’ite Alawi state along its coast, a Sunni state in the Aleppo area, another Sunni state in Damascus hostile to its northern neighbor, and the Druzes who will set up a state, maybe even in our Golan, and certainly in the Hauran and in northern Jordan. This state of affairs will be the guarantee for peace and security in the area in the long run, and that aim is already within our reach today.

            21- How to break up Iraq along ethnic/religious lines
            Iraq, rich in oil on the one hand and internally torn on the other, is guaranteed as a candidate for Israel’s targets. Its dissolution is even more important for us than that of Syria. Iraq is stronger than Syria. In the short run it is Iraqi power which constitutes the greatest threat to Israel. An Iraqi-Iranian war will tear Iraq apart and cause its downfall at home even before it is able to organize a struggle on a wide front against us. Every kind of inter-Arab confrontation will assist us in the short run and will shorten the way to the more important aim of breaking up Iraq into denominations as in Syria and in Lebanon. In Iraq, a division into provinces along ethnic/religious lines as in Syria during Ottoman times is possible. So, three (or more) states will exist around the three major cities: Basra, Baghdad and Mosul, and Shi’ite areas in the south will separate from the Sunni and Kurdish north. It is possible that the present Iranian-Iraqi confrontation will deepen this polarization.

            22- How to break up Saudi Arabia
            The entire Arabian peninsula is a natural candidate for dissolution due to internal and external pressures, and the matter is inevitable especially in Saudi Arabia. Regardless of whether its economic might based on oil remains intact or whether it is diminished in the long run, the internal rifts and breakdowns are a clear and natural development in light of the present political structure.

            23- Transfer power in Jordan from the King to Palestinians
            Jordan constitutes an immediate strategic target in the short run but not in the long run, for it does not constitute a real threat in the long run after its dissolution, the termination of the lengthy rule of King Hussein and the transfer of power to the Palestinians in the short run. There is no chance that Jordan will continue to exist in its present structure for a long time, and Israel’s policy, both in war and in peace, ought to be directed at the liquidation of Jordan under the present regime and the transfer of power to the Palestinian majority.

            24- Change the regime in Jordan and expel Palestinians from Palestine to Jordan
            Changing the regime east of the river will also cause the termination of the problem of the territories densely populated with Arabs west of the Jordan. Whether in war or under conditions of peace, emigration from the territories and economic demographic freeze in them, are the guarantees for the coming change on both banks of the river, and we ought to be active in order to accelerate this process in the nearest future.

            25- Jews must remove all Palestinians and send them to Jordan
            The autonomy plan ought also to be rejected, as well as any compromise or division of the territories for, given the plans of the PLO and those of the Israeli Arabs themselves, the Shefa’amr plan of September 1980, it is not possible to go on living in this country in the present situation without separating the two nations, the Arabs to Jordan and the Jews to the areas west of the river.

            26- Palestinians must understand that Jews must rule over all Palestine-and they need to move to Jordan
            Genuine coexistence and peace will reign over the land only when the Arabs understand that without Jewish rule between the Jordan and the sea they will have neither existence nor security. A nation of their own and security will be theirs only in Jordan.

            27- Palestinians consider all of Palestine stolen irrespective of 1948 or 1967 and Jews consider all of Palestine theirs – even beyond Jordan River
            Within Israel the distinction between the areas of ’67 and the territories beyond them, those of ’48, has always been meaningless for Arabs and nowadays no longer has any significance for us. The problem should be seen in its entirety without any divisions as of ’67. It should be clear, under any future political situation or military constellation, that the solution of the problem of the indigenous Arabs will come only when they recognize the existence of Israel in secure borders up to the Jordan river and beyond it, as our existential need in this difficult epoch, the nuclear epoch which we shall soon enter.

            28- The West Bank must be populated with Jews or else Jews will be defeated like crusaders.
            Dispersal of the population is therefore a domestic strategic aim of the highest order; otherwise, we shall cease to exist within any borders. Judea, Samaria and the Galilee are our sole guarantee for national existence, and if we do not become the majority in the mountain areas, we shall not rule in the country and we shall be like the Crusaders, who lost this country which was not theirs anyhow, and in which they were foreigners to begin with. Rebalancing the country demographically, strategically and economically is the highest and most central aim today. Taking hold of the mountain watershed from Beersheba to the Upper Galilee is the national aim generated by the major strategic consideration which is settling the mountainous part of the country that is empty of Jews today.

            29- No force can remove the Jews from Palestine
            Our existence in this country itself is certain, and there is no force that could remove us from here either forcefully or by treachery (Sadat’s method). Despite the difficulties of the mistaken “peace” policy and the problem of the Israeli Arabs and those of the territories, we can effectively deal with these problems in the foreseeable future.

          • peepsqueek

            Do you figure that if you thrown enough stuff out there to cloud the water completely, then you have won some kind of argument?

  • Min Zan

    The title is misleading. Macron is in favor of a 2 states solution. As he explained, France can not recognize UNILATERALY a Palestinian state because it would destabilize the relations with Israel. I would add, we don’t need mossad terrorism. Fyi, most of the terror attacks in Europe were occured quickly after European Union and several of its countries making statement that they were in favor of recognizing unilaterily a Palestinian state.

  • Mike Abramov

    The only time France, or any western democracy, will recognise Palestine as a separate, democratic,, not-tribal, non-partisan and not anti-Zionist state is when that liar idiot Abbas steps down and the West Bank puts in place a decent honourable man that is willing to negotiate on a pragmatic basis.

    There is so much Israel and Palestine could do together in building a union to work together that will benefit both societies….and yes Nethanyahu could also be a little more flexible.

    • Vikas Sood

      Better idea, Undo injust act of creating Israel & initiated by corrupt rothchilds. Let the population be absorbed France, UK, US. Who created this drama

      • Helen4Yemen

        Exactly! This is like Britain forcing the Kenyans to make a union.

        There is no union between rapist and rape victim, between the

        colonizers and the colonized. Nothing prevents these Europeans

        from going home – absolutely nothing except that US won’t be

        raining the billions if these snow-white Europeans were to return.

      • peepsqueek

        They created the drama of defeating the Ottoman Turks in WWI after four hundred years of domination, allowing for all these independent Arab States and one tiny Jewish State that exist today.

        After the allies forces defeated the Ottomans and their German allies, how do you think the Middle East land mass should have been divided among Sunnis and Shias, cities and tribes, sheiks and tribesmen, Assyrians and Kurds, pan-Arabists, state nationalists, Copts and Arabs, Jews and Palestinian Arabs? Or did you want them to just fight it out as they are doing today? Only people like Helen would agree with you that Jews are responsible for all this age old sectarian divide, which has been going on long before the tiny Jewish State.

        • Vikas Sood

          What u mean Asians are responsible for Europeans for being Colonialist,Barbarians,Inhuman? Your argument is stupid. Take them away to europe & sort it out there. Be fair at least once, for a change…

          • peepsqueek

            Ottoman Empire from the 16th century on. Controlled parts of Europe, much of North Africa, all of the Fertile Crescent, none of the Gulf. Lost its imperial domains when it was defeated by European powers in World War I after having lost (most) North African provinces by the end of the 19th century. Turkey itself remained independent throughout. The Republic was re-established under Attaturk in 1923. The colonial take over of these territories became independent states within a relatively short time after.

            On the other hand, the Arab world used to be the second wealthiest region in the world at the end of WWII, when most of those Countries were already independent. Independence seemed to have hurt them. Eastern Europe was under communism. Latin America, Africa, India and China were starving to death. Within 50 years of WWII, China and India had become world powers, Latin America is growing rapidly, Eastern Europe had become capitalist and democratic, and even Africa was getting rid of some of its dictators, whereas the Arab world, with vast oil and gas wealth, was stuck with the same dictators, and much of the same poverty and the same illiteracy. You know that I did not fabricate this.

            Germany and Japan, the two most devastated Countries after the war, rose to be come super economic powers within decades. Five million Germans starved to death in occupied Germany after the war, and another two million died in labor camps. Millions of Germans died as a result of ethnic cleansing carried out by, Russians, Poles, Czechs, and Serbs according to the former German Prime Minister Konrad Adenauer.

      • Michael Abramov

        ….and where are you going to put all the Jewish and Christian Israelis? They want to stay under the Israeli flag.
        India was one nation before 1947, Was the creation of Pakistan justified? No, Your corrupt Mohammed Ali Gina laid the groundwork for the training ground for all the Muslim terrorists.

        • Vikas Sood

          Are u that Naive Abramov? They will become palestinian Jews & christians as they were… seems u watch Hollywood movies lots..

          • Mike Abramov

            When they were Palestinian Jews they were not allowed full access to the Wailing Wall.

            The Palestinian Arabs will control the movement of the the Jews and the Christian sites of worship and there will be an end to democracy….but, if that is what you want….

        • Helen4Yemen

          You must be out of your mind! India was partitioned to give land to the Muslim natives of India. Palestine was stolen by snow-white Europeans known as the Ashkenazi! Where did the “Christian Israelis” come from?
          There was no “Jewish Israeli”, there was only Lithuanian, Hungarian, Russian … Jews. Do you understand that this snow-white man in Palestine is just like the French in Algeria and the British in Kenya?

          Remember: SNOW-WHITE-ASHKENAZI = EUROPEAN

          • Mike Abramov

            Skin colour is irrelevant, but not to you. Get your facts right. India was partitioned purely on religious grounds which meant a massive transition of migrants being forced from their homes because the Muslims wanted partition.

            There are more Musllims living in India than there are in Pakistan. Your argument is nonsense.

          • Helen4Yemen

            Sudan, Ethiopia,India … were partitioned to separate

            a people that had always lived together. Palestine was ]

            partitioned to give free land to snow-white Jews from

            Lithuania, Germany, Hungary …

          • Mike Abramov

            ‘Sudan, Ethiopia, India … were partitioned to separate a people that had always lived together’.

            Rubbish.

            India, specifically The Punjab was partitioned because a certain Mohammed Ali Gina wanted a Muslim state. Gandhi did not want partition and was assassinated accordingly. The previous 400 years saw 400 years of war between Muslims, Hindus and Sikhs. Get your facts right.

            As for the Sudan and Ethiopia, the various tribes never did live happily together and you know that….supporting the Houti tribe.

            You do need to re-evaluate the levels of prejudice you seem to be ingrained with.

          • Helen4Yemen

            You choose to remain in the dark on purpose. Stay focused and do not stray off topic. The topic was INDIGENOUS VS. FOREIGN.
            ……………..
            The partitions in India-Pakistan, Sudan-South-Sudan were done to separate indigenous peoples living together. Palestine was partitioned to give free Arab land to snow-white Europeans known as the Ashkenazi. It is exactly like if the French were to ask for Algeria to be partitioned into 2 states, one for the French and the other for the natives Algerians.

          • Mike Abramov

            Ok. Let’s get to the real point of your ‘argument’. You are a racist that cannot accept that people of different colour and religion. Until you can reconcile your appalling attitude, may I suggest you speak to a guru or imam and stop wasting cyber space on your disgusting attitude.

          • Helen4Yemen

            Did you say that the partition of Pakistan was similar to that of

            snow-white-Ashkenazi given part of Palestine? No snow-white

            Ashkenazi ever lived on that soil until snow-white arrived in the

            1880’s to colonize the land. The Yemenis removed the British

            after 160 years and the Algerians removed the French after

            132 years. Tell me why should this snow white remain clinging to

            Arab land when his snow-white brothers the British and the French

            left. Tell me what is different about this snow white known as the

            Ashkenazi than other European colonists of Arab land? Why should

            his snow-white European a– continue to remain stuck where he

            does not belong?

          • Helen4Yemen

            Snow-white Ashkenazi does tell the world that he is

            descended from his grandpa Abraham of Ur – Iraq –

            who stolen Palestine – and snow-white Ashkenazi claims

            Palestine is his on account that god had given that land

            to grandpa Abraham? That in a nutshell is the reason why

            this snow-white is on Arab land. Is there any other reason?

          • Mike Abramov

            Wrong again. Going back to the end of the 19th century, Jews BOUGHT land from the Arabs and continued to do so for decades. There are records to prove this. Now go back to school and study history

          • Helen4Yemen

            They bought land? Why did they have to buy the land? Isn’t this their grandpa Abraham’s and grandma Sarah’s land? God said to them:
            kill and force out the natives, did he not?

            Exodus 33:2-3 It is a land rich with milk and honey, and I will send an angel to force out those people who live there—the Canaanites, the Amorites, the Hittites, the Perizzites, the Hivites, and the Jebusites. I would go with my people, but they are so rebellious that I would destroy them before they get there.

            Exodus 34:11 I will force out the Amorites, the Canaanites, the Hittites, the Perizzites, the Hivites, and the Jebusites, but you must do what I command you today.

            Exodus 34:24 I will force the nations out of your land and enlarge your borders. Then no one will try to take your property when you come to worship me these three times each year.

            Numbers 32:21 You also agreed to cross the Jordan and stay with the rest of the Israelites, until the Lord forces our enemies out of the land.

            Numbers 33:52 you must force out the people living there. Destroy their idols and tear down their altars.

            Numbers 33:55 If you don’t force out all the people there, they will be like pointed sticks in your eyes and thorns in your back. They will always be trouble for you,

            Deuteronomy 7:2 the Lord will force them out of the land. Then you must destroy them without mercy. Don’t make any peace treaties with them,

            Deuteronomy 7:22 As you attack these nations, the Lord will force them out little by little.

            Deuteronomy 9:1 Moses said: Israel, listen to me! You will soon cross the Jordan River and go into the land to force out the nations that live there.

            Joshua 3:10 The Canaanites, the Hittites, the Hivites, the Perizzites, the Girgashites, the Amorites, and the Jebusites control the land on the other side of the river. But the living God will be with you and will force them out of the land when you attack. And now, God is going to prove that he’s powerful enough to force them out.

            2 Chronicles 20:7 Our God, you forced out the nations who lived in this land before your people Israel came here, and you gave it to the descendants of your friend Abraham forever.

          • Vikas Sood

            This stupid logics and reasonings of Westerners need to be exposed. Well done. No one has done bigger harm to peace than anglo~saxons. Merkel just realized it y”day.

          • Helen4Yemen

            By the time the stampede had begun by snow-white Europeans to Palestine in 1882, Jewish land ownership was less than 0.1% of Palestine. By 1947, all that the snow-white Europeans managed to buy was 6.6% of Palestine and the rest they stole. Whose land is the snow-white European giving up for peace? The Palestinians’ land? Funny!

            hey stole. Jewish land ownership in Palestine
            of total area of 26,323,000 dunums
            1882 — 22,500 —- 0.1% (Ashkenazi colonial settlers arrived )
            1900 — 218,000 — 0.8%
            1914 — 418,000 — 1.6%
            1927 — 865,000 — 3.2%
            1936 — 1,231,000 — 4.7%
            1945 — 1,588,365 — 6.%
            1947 — 1,734,000 — 6.6%

          • Helen4Yemen

            “Jews” did not buy land. Snow-white European Ashkenazi did.

          • Mike Abramov

            My response must be directed to a person who bases her entire philosophy on the colour of a person’s skin or their alleged DNA. However, I will make the following suggestion;

            ‘If all the Muslims and Arabs pooled some money together and bought from the Jewish state all the science, medicine, technology, ingenuity they have given to the world since 1948 and return Palestine back to the dust bowl that it was before 1919, then maybe we might have a deal’.

            By-the-way, your mobile phone and your computer is full of Israeli technology….you will have to return these back to the Jewish state.

          • Jane Paxman

            Sorry to burst your jew feelings of superiority, but those Arabs were the ones who advanced science, medicine, technology, etc .. while the jews were ‘wandering’ and rootless.
            Name one piece of technology that was invented by a jew.
            I will research it for facts.
            Hurry up then Mike, make yourself useful and find the excluvise jew invention.
            Other than usury, and exploitation- they lack creativity to produce anything original … not to mention their expropriation of Arab clothing and foods.

          • Mike Abramov

            Jane – Jew is spelled with a capital ‘J’. Grammar!

            I now come to your diatribe.

            After 620 A.C.E the Arabs had conquered and converted most of the ME and North Africa at the point of a sword. What followed was 400 years of astonishing cultural, scientific and academic growth. Baghdad had a massive library and it was here that the bible was translated from Aramaic to Greek and then Latin.

            Between 490 A.C.E and the first millennia the Jews were recovering from the mess that the demise of the Roman empire had left. The Barbarians had shattered the confidence of the Romans. Jews started moving north and north west. Here they tried to settle in the new burgeoning countries that were now independent of Roman rule.

            This took many hundreds of years because the Catholics did not want Jews to integrate too much. However, over the following millennia the Jews became the most creative and industrious people per capita than any other people.

            In the sciences, Jews have won 22 percent of all the Nobel Prizes ever awarded – 29 percent of the prizes since 1950, after the Holocaust destroyed a third of their numbers. Given their small population, Jews should have earned only one of the 502 Nobels awarded for physics, chemistry, medicine and physiology. They have won 123.

            Encyclopedia Britannica provides its list of “Great Inventions.” Of the 267 individual inventors, more than 13 were Jews, including Zoll (the defibrillator and the pacemaker), Land (instant photography), Gabor (holography), and Ginsburg (videotape). Jews are represented on the list 22 times more than one would expect based on their population.

            The Jews are only successful because they have to be. There have been numerous attempts to destroy the Jews. The Spanish Inquisition. The Russian Pogroms and of course the Holocaust.

            Does this answer your question?

          • Jane Paxman

            No, it actually doesn’t, jew.
            Perhaps you should copy and paste relevant information next time.

          • Mike Abramov

            May I suggest you see a psychiatrist. My guess is that you are quite an elderly lady living in the Bible Belt or a very young Southerner Either way, you have mental issues that manifests itself in the hatred of Jews.

          • Jane Paxman

            I have taken psychology courses.
            Fact, circumcisions cause mental problems and you’re the male jew here.
            Oy vey! Maybe that can explain why israelis are sadists.
            Well half of them. Doesn’t explain the nasty behaviour of the horse-faced israeli women.
            I’m young.
            Looking at you, I will also add that I watch what I eat.
            Thanks for the compliment.
            My writing has always been thought of as matue.

          • Helen4Yemen

            OK, skin color is irrelevant, but is DNA? DNA has confirmed
            that the Ashkenazi have no trace of Middle East ancestry,
            zero, zilch! Here are 10 samples that look almost identical
            because the Ashkenazi are a closely knit group that had
            been breeding among its own members for centuries. The
            Ashkenazi is in fact one of the purest and whitest of any
            European groups at a stunning level of 99.9% European.

            Name………………………. European……. Middle Eastern
            1) Alex Feinberg…………… 99.8% …………… 0%
            2) Dershowitz DNA………. 99.9% …………….0%
            3) Rabbi Hammerman…,,, 99.9% …………… 0%
            4) Tony Kushner…………… 99.9% …………….0%
            5) Joseph Cohen………….. 99.8% …………… 0%
            6) Bill Maher…………………..99.9% ……………..0%
            7) Neil Gaiman……………… 99.9% …………… .0%
            8) Jill Sobule………….. …….99.9% ……………..0%
            9) Alisa R Doctoroff…….. ..98.0% …………….. 0%
            10) A.J. Jacobs………………99.9% ……………. 0%

            Source:

            https://disqus*com/home/channel/semite/discussion/channel-semite/stunning_ashkenazi_dna/

    • Helen4Yemen

      Why can’t snow-white Ashkenazi make a union with his own people

      in Lithuania, Poland, Russia, Germany? If the Palestinians agree to a

      union with their invaders and killers, it would only be from a position of

      weakness similar to how a rapist rapes his victim because he is much

      strong than she is. The French did not ask the Algerians for a union nor

      did the British ask the Kenyans for a union. What is the reason

      snow-whiteAshkenazi is asking the Palestinians for a union?

      • peepsqueek

        You know the reason, your just to singled minded to answer your own question. Your only ambition is to have the banner of Islam to fly over every inch of the land.

        • Helen4Yemen

          Why is it the business of the snow-white Ashkenazi where the flag of Islam flies in the Middle East? Is the snow-white Ashkenazi Middle Eastern?

          • peepsqueek

            Because Europe in the number one primary destination for refugees and people fleeing Islamic Countries, snow-white people Europeans and others have their concerns.

      • Michael Abramov

        Helen – you are really running out of arguments. In this much enlightened world, colour prejudice is really unacceptable.

        • Helen4Yemen

          You have not told me why the Ashkenazi cannot go home and live in peace with the Europeans? Give me just one reason.

          • peepsqueek

            They already live in peace, plus they have a Jewish State to protect them should the rise of Euro-fascism and Islamo-fascism should ever raise its ugly head against Jews. Makes sense, doesn’t it?

  • deceneu♔♘

    Macron is Jewish and of course he will support Israel’s position.

    • g. f. nestel

      He is Catholic

      • deceneu♔♘

        I beg to differ.More like Crypto Jew

        • Michael Abramov

          OK, that’s enough. If you are going to confuse Jews with Zionists, you have just demonstrated what an idiot you are.

          • deceneu♔♘

            There’s no confusion whatsoever.I think you are either misinformed or you are a Jew thinking all g o y s are dumb.

          • peepsqueek

            Ideologies and cultural dynamics are more important than the size of your brain. No non-Muslim wants to live under Islamic sharia and political Islam. I don’t know of any Muslim Americans that want to go and live under Islamic laws and punishments.

          • deceneu♔♘

            Can you read? I guess not

          • Helen4Yemen

            If Muslim countries are so bad, why are these Jews still living in country with large Muslim populations? Who is stopping them from just getting their suitcase ready and heading home?

            Country……….. % Muslim….. ……Jews

            Iran…………………… 99.7%……….. 9,000
            Azerbaijan…………. 98.4%……….. 9,000
            Kazakhstan ……….. 56%…………. 3,000
            Lebanon…………….. 60%……………. 200
            Morocco…………….. 99.9%………. 6,000
            Pakistan…………….. 96.4%…………. 200
            Tunisia ……………… 99.8%………. 1,000
            Turkey ………………. 98.6%…….. 18,000
            Turkmenistan ……… 93.3%………… 200

          • peepsqueek

            Those few people are either impoverished, too old, or they have some established connections that make their lives acceptable. But the masses have found a better life else where. It is not that Muslims are bad, it is the fact that political Islam, Islamic sharia, dictatorships, and totalitarianism are not acceptable to most people in the 21st century. You mentioned Countries that are somewhat livable to educated people.

          • Mike Abramov

            Now I know what sort of person I am dealing with. Good-bye

          • deceneu♔♘

            Yeah, you just realized you’re dealing with a smart g o y

          • Mike Abramov

            GOY. Translation:A national. Origin Hebrew and used in Yiddish too.

            GOYIM. Plural of Goy.

            Goy, Sometimes used in the derogatory sense to criticise the foolish behaviour or attitude of a non-Jew of European origin.

          • peepsqueek

            It is good of you educate the readers, even though it is lost on Mr. Deceneu

          • Mike Abramov

            Thanks. The cascade of crap that bubbles from this site is unbelievable sometimes.

          • peepsqueek

            I don’t see it as unbelievable. If you are given certain messages from the time you are born, it will implant something in your identity and thought process. That goes for all of us. It is like religion, some of the smartest people in the world will throw all logic and reasoning out the window when it comes to their religious beliefs and ideology. Some very smart, well educated people still believe that the first man was created from a lump of clay or dirt, during the six days that the universe and everything in it was created.

          • Helen4Yemen

            Of course by the Jew of European origin?

          • Mike Abramov

            Goy is a Hebrew word and is used in Yiddish too. Like algebra and zero are Arabic words used in the European languages. You really must try and deal with hatred before it devours you.

          • Helen4Yemen

            Yidishe kop, yiddishe kopf, yidisha kopf = Jewish brain, strong brain, fast, cunning

            Goyishe kop = gentile brain, stupid, slow brain, donkey brain. Gentile head, stupid, idiot,

            When a Jew gets angry at another, they often say “you goyishe kop” meaning you with a gentile brain – meaning stupid.

            1- Someone who fails to use his/her head; a dull mind. Someone who thinks like a non-Jew. Lit. “non-Jewish head.”

            2- goyishe kop. The title means “gentile head” in Yiddish. When uttered by a Jew, it usually implies “stupid.”

            3- There’s an expression in Yiddish, “goyishe kop,” that literally means “gentile head,” but should be translated as “moron head,” or “big dummy head,”

            4- The title means “gentile head” in Yiddish. When uttered by a Jew, it usually implies “stupid.” As in, to have a goyishe kop is to be stupid, or, at best, ignorant.

            5- Goyishe kop is a Yiddish phrase that literally means “gentile head” (goyishe is pronounced like “goy-isha”). According to the Jewish English Lexicon, it can be defined as “Someone who fails to use his/her head; a dull mind.” It also means: “Someone who thinks like a non-Jew.”

          • Helen4Yemen

            Why is Zionism not = Judaism?

            Exodus 23:31 I will see that your borders reach from the Red Sea to the Euphrates River and from the Mediterranean Sea to the desert. I will let you defeat the people who live there, and you will force them out of the land.

          • Mike Abramov

            There are fundamentally three types of Jew

            1. The Jew who is a Zionist
            2.The Jew who is just a Jew
            3. The Jew who is anti-Zionist (the Jewish left-wing and the Neturei Karta)

            You may be too young to understand this depth of reply, but people are driven by the way they feel, not by an accident of birth. This is why some Jews are not Zionist and some are Zionist. So, if you wish to cite Exodus it is meaningless to me who is a Zionist and not religious.

            Your reply will include the same repetition as before so, don’t bother replying until you have grown up a little.

        • peepsqueek

          What is the Crypto Jewish bottom line?

          • deceneu♔♘

            You should know……….

          • peepsqueek

            If that is your best academic response, then so be it.

    • kwake13

      He is Zionist not Jewish.

      • deceneu♔♘

        Same damned thing.Zionists are Jews and a lot of Jews support Zionism.

        • kwake13

          “a lot of Jews support Zionism” but not all especially the intellectual ones. There are Christian Zionists as well as Zionist Jews.

          • deceneu♔♘

            Christian Zionists? Are you kidding me?
            You know why they support Zionism? Because they believe that when Jesus/Messiah returns all Jews will convert to Christianity and the ones that don’t go straight to hell.You know why Jews support them and especially in US? Because they are useful idiots, and vote pro Israel each time every time.
            With friends like that who need enemies. As for Zionist Jews you say poteto i say potato.

          • kwake13

            If only the Christians would read the Talmud.

          • Helen4Yemen

            95% of world Jewry supported the Gaza carnage of 2009 and 2014.

            Zionism = Judaism. Yes or no?

            Exodus 33:2-3 It is a land rich with milk and honey, and I will send an angel to force out those people who live there—the Canaanites, the Amorites, the Hittites, the Perizzites, the Hivites, and the Jebusites. I would go with my people, but they are so rebellious that I would destroy them before they get there.

            Exodus 34:11 I will force out the Amorites, the Canaanites, the Hittites, the Perizzites, the Hivites, and the Jebusites, but you must do what I command you today.

            Exodus 34:24 I will force the nations out of your land and enlarge your borders. Then no one will try to take your property when you come to worship me these three times each year.

            Numbers 32:21 You also agreed to cross the Jordan and stay with the rest of the Israelites, until the Lord forces our enemies out of the land.

            Numbers 33:52 you must force out the people living there. Destroy their idols and tear down their altars.

            Numbers 33:55 If you don’t force out all the people there, they will be like pointed sticks in your eyes and thorns in your back. They will always be trouble for you,

            Deuteronomy 7:2 the Lord will force them out of the land. Then you must destroy them without mercy. Don’t make any peace treaties with them,

            Deuteronomy 7:22 As you attack these nations, the Lord will force them out little by little.

            Deuteronomy 9:1 Moses said: Israel, listen to me! You will soon cross the Jordan River and go into the land to force out the nations that live there.

            Joshua 3:10 The Canaanites, the Hittites, the Hivites, the Perizzites, the Girgashites, the Amorites, and the Jebusites control the land on the other side of the river. But the living God will be with you and will force them out of the land when you attack. And now, God is going to prove that he’s powerful enough to force them out.

            2 Chronicles 20:7 Our God, you forced out the nations who lived in this land before your people Israel came here, and you gave it to the descendants of your friend Abraham forever.

    • Michael Abramov

      Macron is Jewish? Do your research before you make an idiot of yourself. His family are Catholic by birth, but not religious.

      • deceneu♔♘

        It seems to me that your response is kind of harsh.
        Insinuating that i am an idiot does not change the fact that Macron is a Jew.
        There are a lot of Jews fronting as Catholics ,Muslims, ,
        Orthodox Christians when in fact they are all Jews.
        Heck we had some Cardinals that were Jews, we had Priests that were Jews even a Pope that was a Jew so you see don’t be an idiot do your home work first and than open your mouth.
        PS I know that YOU are a Jew and is only natural for you to front for the tribe.
        Have a nice day.

        • Mike Abramov

          Are you by any chance a neo-Nazi?

          If you are still persisting that Macron is a Jew, so what? He is either a good person or a bad person. His religion is irrelevant However, I suggest you take this argument up with Wikipedia.

          Frankly, looking at the pattern of your responses to other comment, I believe that you are a troll. I get the impression you are doing this for a laugh and have no interest in the care and welfare for others. So, get lost.

          • deceneu♔♘

            Typical Jew defense when the truth about Jews is inconvenient to them.
            Not working anymore chance the script

  • Zaphod Braden

    Married to MOMMY.
    Nursed by Merkel.
    OWNED by Rothschild.

    • Mike Abramov

      Owned by Rothschild? Are you living in the 21st century?

      BNP (Banque National de Paris in case you are ignorant) maybe?

  • collette.robert@yahoo.com

    I don’t recognize the French president, hoping to maintain good relationships with the French people.

  • Vikas Sood

    It”s time France alongwith UK needs to be ousted from UNSC. They both even Don”t have 1% of world population, have very dirty colonial past, defy UN and keep in doing dirty and corrupt acts alongwith NATO & US.

  • Vikas Sood

    France needs to be taken to task for defying UN, the world body. And a fit case to be thrown out of UNSC along with UK.

  • garwain

    Macron was handed the presidency by his masters, The Global Elite, Rothschild bankers. His non-disclosure of overseas bank accounts in The Cayman Isles was censored in the media by French administration.

    • Michael Abramov

      I do not think you understand the word democracy so, your task is to evidence this piece of nonsense you have written before you consider yourself worthy of adding anything else to your racist theories.

  • spirittoo

    Correction … the new illegitimate French president will not recognize Palestine. Seeing how the cabal got him in through massive election fraud it would go with out saying their puppet would make such a statement.

    • deceneu♔♘

      Nailed it.

  • Ismail ALjazaeri

    Well, Why do you think the west and its Arab allies are destroying Syria? You guessed it, to please Israel. Instability in Syria is ok for them, because it serves primarily the Zionist state.

  • evsw

    French politics is resembling the U.S. in that it’s political class is in thrall of the so-called ‘Jewish State’.

  • Helen4Yemen

    The name is PALESTINE – not Israel

    Jabotinsky (1923)

    “This is equally true of the Arabs. Our Peace-mongers are trying to persuade us that the Arabs are either fools, whom we can deceive by masking our real aims, or that they are corrupt and can be bribed to abandon to us their claim to priority in Palestine , in return for cultural and economic advantages. I repudiate this conception of the Palestinian Arabs. Culturally they are five hundred years behind us, they have neither our endurance nor our determination; but they are just as good psychologists as we are, and their minds have been sharpened like ours by centuries of fine-spun logomachy. We may tell them whatever we like about the innocence of our aims, watering them down and sweetening them with honeyed words to make them palatable, but they know what we want, as well as we know what they do not want. They feel at least the same instinctive jealous love of Palestine, as the old Aztecs felt for ancient Mexico, and the Sioux for their rolling Prairies.”

  • Helen4Yemen

    The name is PALESTINE – not Israel

    Mark Twain: Not a good idea to let the cunning Jews have their state:

    “Speaking of concentration, Dr. Herzl has a clear insight into the value of that. Have you heard of his plan? He wishes to gather the Jews of the world together in Palestine, with a government of their own – under the suzerainty of the Sultan, I suppose. At the Convention of Berne, last year, there were delegates from everywhere, and the proposal was received with decided favor. I am not the Sultan, and I am not objecting; but if that concentration of the cunningest brains in the world were going to be made in a free country (bar Scotland), I think it would be politic to stop it. It will not be well to let the race find out its strength. If the horses knew theirs, we should not ride any more.”

    (Mark Twain: Concerning The Jews, Harper’s Magazine, March, 1898)

    • Jack

      ….. A desolate country whose soil is rich enough, but is given over wholly to weeds… a silent mournful expanse…. a desolation…. we never saw a human being on the whole route.… hardly a tree or shrub anywhere. Even the olive tree and the cactus, those fast friends of a worthless soil, had almost deserted the country.”

      The Innocents Abroad Mark Twain

  • Helen4Yemen

    The name is PALESTINE – not Israel

    Jabotinsky: Zionism = colonialism

    Colonization carries its own explanation, the only possible explanation, unalterable and as clear as daylight to every ordinary Jew and every ordinary Arab. colonization can have only one aim, and Palestine Arabs cannot accept this aim. It lies in the very nature of things, and in this particular regard nature cannot be changed.”

    • Jack

      “THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS THE PALESTINIAN PEOPLE. IT IS JUST AN ARAB TACTIC FOR THE DESTRUCTION OF ISRAEL!”
      PLO executive committee member Zahir Muhsein

      “The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a
      Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle
      against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality
      today there is no difference between Jordanians,
      Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and
      tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of
      a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand
      that we posit the existence of a distinct ‘Palestinian
      people’ to oppose Zionism.
      “For tactical reasons, Jordan, which is a sovereign state
      with defined borders, cannot raise claims to Haifa and Jaffa.
      While as a Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa,
      Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem. However, the moment we
      reclaim our right to all of Palestine, we will not wait even
      a minute to unite Palestine and Jordan.” .!!

  • Helen4Yemen

    Theodore Herzl: How to bribe the Sultan

    “Without preparation, I told Newlinsky that we imagine that Palestine would be given to us for £20 million. Two million would be given to Palestine on the basis of the capitalisation of its present [1896] yield of £80,000 annually. With the other £18 million, we should free Turkey from the Control Commission.”

    Theodor Herzl, founder of political Zionism, 1860 – 1904,
    from a Personal Diary entry 18 May 1896.

  • Helen4Yemen

    Gandhi:

    Palestine belongs to the Arabs in the same sense that England belongs to the English or France to the French. It is wrong and inhuman to impose the Jews on the Arabs. What is going on in Palestine today cannot be justified by any moral code of conduct. The mandates have no sanction but that of the last war. Surely it would be a crime against humanity to reduce the proud Arabs so that Palestine can be restored to the Jews partly or wholly as their national home. The nobler course would be to insist on a just treatment of the Jews wherever they are born and bred. The Jews born in France are French in precisely the same sense that Christians born in France are French.”

    (Mahatma Gandhi, 26 November 1938)
    _______________

    Snow-white-European Chaim Weizmann:

    “By a Jewish National Home I mean the creation of such conditions that as the country is developed we can pour in a considerable number of immigrants, and finally establish such a society in Palestine that Palestine shall be as Jewish as England is English or America American.” (1919)

  • Helen4Yemen

    Note: “fellahin” is referring to the Palestinian farmers.

    David Ben-Gurion – 1918: “The fellahin are not descendants of the Arab conquerors, who captured Eretz Israel and Syria in the seventh century CE. The Arab victors did not destroy the agricultural population they found in the country. They expelled only the alien Byzantine rulers, and did not touch the local population. Nor did the Arabs go in for settlement.”

    David Ben-Gurion- 1918: “Even in their former habitations the Arabs did not engage in farming…their whole interest in the new countries was political, religious and material: to rule, to propagate Islam, and to collect taxes…the Jewish farmer, like any other farmer, was not easily torn from his soil…Despite the repression and suffering the rural population remained unchanged.”

    Itzhak Ben-Zvi – 1929: “The great majority of the fellahin do not descend from the Arab conquerors but before that, from the Jewish fellahin, who were the foundation of this country before its conquest by Islam.”

    Benny Morris: “The vast majority of Arabs who live in Palestine originated in Palestine, ‘originated’ meaning they have been living in Palestine for hundreds of years.”

    Translation: The Arabs did not expel the natives of the land and take their place, they did not settle on the land, they were there only to convert the people into Islam, therefore, the current Palestinian population are the descendants of those who were already there before the arrival of the Arabs. The Palestinian Jews (who later converted to Christianity and then to Islam) never left their land nor were they replaced by the Arabs. The Arabs did not come to settle on the land but rather “to rule, to propagate Islam, and to collect taxes”. The Jewish farmers were attached to their land. “was not easily torn from his soil” and the current Palestinians are in fact the descendants of the people who were already there on that land before the arrival of the Arabs.

  • Helen4Yemen

    David Ben-Gurion: We the European Jews will steal all of Palestine – little by little:

    “The present map of Palestine was drawn by the British mandate. The Jewish people have another map which our youth and adults should strive to fulfill-from the Nile to the Euphrates.”

  • Helen4Yemen

    Gandhi:

    “The cry for the national home for the Jews does not make much appeal to me. The sanction for it is sought in the Bible and the tenacity with which the Jews have hankered after return to Palestine. Why should they not, like other peoples of the earth, make that country their home where they are born and where they earn their livelihood? Palestine belongs to the Arabs in the same sense that England belongs to the English or France to the French. It is wrong and inhuman to impose the Jews on the Arabs. What is going on in Palestine today cannot be justified by any moral code of conduct. The mandates have no sanction but that of the last war. Surely it would be a crime against humanity to reduce the proud Arabs so that Palestine can be restored to the Jews partly or wholly as their national home. The nobler course would be to insist on a just treatment of the Jews wherever they are born and bred. The Jews born in France are French. If the Jews have no home but Palestine, will they relish the idea of being forced to leave the other parts of the world in which they are settled? Or do they want a double home where they can remain at will? This cry for the national home affords a colourable justification for the German expulsion of the Jews.”

  • Jack

    Why should he, as there are NO Palestinian people, even the Palestinians them-self announce it.

    “THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS THE PALESTINIAN PEOPLE. IT IS JUST AN ARAB TACTIC FOR THE DESTRUCTION OF ISRAEL!”
    PLO executive committee member Zahir Muhsein

    “The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a
    Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle
    against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality
    today there is no difference between Jordanians,
    Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and
    tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of
    a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand
    that we posit the existence of a distinct ‘Palestinian
    people’ to oppose Zionism.
    “For tactical reasons, Jordan, which is a sovereign state
    with defined borders, cannot raise claims to Haifa and Jaffa.
    While as a Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa,
    Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem. However, the moment we

    reclaim our right to all of Palestine, we will not wait even

    a minute to unite Palestine and Jordan.” .!!

  • Vikas Sood

    The biggest point is Europeans made www1, ww2 and dragged others too in it. In the end, if they wanted white Jewish state, they shud have carved it in Europe or US. Who was Rothschild to propose and what”s moral correctness of balfour proposal? Let them do it now…Let asia live in peace..