Espanol / English

Middle East Near You

‘We have not borrowed water from anyone,’ Egypt tells Sudan

In Egypt, River Nile in Damietta [Mohamed Eissa/Wikipedia]
In Egypt, River Nile in Damietta [Mohamed Eissa/Wikipedia]

“We have not borrowed Nile water from anyone; the High Dam was threatened because of Sudan,” said Egyptian Foreign Minister Sameh Shoukry to his Sudanese counterpart Ibrahim Ghandour, who said that “Egypt has been using part of Sudan’s share of Nile water for years”.

In response to an enquiry from the Egyptian Middle East News Agency (MENA) about the Sudanese minister’s statements, Shoukry said that “the water Egypt has previously used of Sudan’s share was a surplus to its absorptive capacity and under its approval, not an advance or a grant”.

On 21 November 2017 Ghandour told Russia Today that “Egypt has used part of Sudan’s share of Nile water for many years. That is the reason why we are worried because we will lose that water supply when the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam is finished since it will enable Sudan to benefit from its full share”.

Read more: Saudi Arabia arrests main investor in Ethiopia’s dam

Creditor and debtor

Shoukry described Ghandour’s arguments as “inaccurate” and expressed his astonishment and surprise at “putting things this way, and even talking about a creditor and debtor in the water relations between the two countries, which is not related to natural resources”.

Shoukry explained that “Sudan has long been using its entire share of Nile water, which is estimated at 18.5 billion cubic metres per year”.

He also said: “In previous years, the absorptive capacity of the Sudan for that share was incomplete. Therefore, there was an overflowing part of it which has been going to the river in Egypt without its will and with the consent of Sudan”.

He added: “However, this water has been a burden and a danger to the High Dam due to the unexpected increase in its storage capacity, especially at the time of the high flood, which led Egypt to discharge these excess quantities in the river or in Toshka Lakes behind the Dam, but in vain”.

Read more: Ethiopia to start storing water from Grand Renaissance Dam

He continued: “It is incomprehensible to deal with this issue at the present time amid the obstruction of studies on the impact of the Renaissance Dam on the two countries’ uses of the Nile water, and the lack of Sudan and Ethiopia’s consent on the introductory report of the technical, specialised, and impartial Advisory Bureau.”

Last week Egypt announced it has frozen technical negotiations with Sudan and Ethiopia following a tripartite meeting in Cairo after Egyptian officials rejected the two countries’ amendments to the studies of the Advisory Bureau on the Dam and its filling and operation.

Last Saturday, Egyptian President Abdel Fattah Al-Sisi said that no one could touch Egypt’s water share, stressing that it is a matter of “life or death” in his first comment after his country announced the suspension of negotiations.

Egypt fears possible negative impacts of the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam on its 55.5 billion cubic metres of water, while Addis Ababa says the dam is not aimed at harming Egypt. The electricity which would be generated by the dam will help eradicate poverty and boost Ethiopia’s developmental renaissance.

Categories
AfricaEgyptMiddle EastNewsSaudi ArabiaSudan
  • Aba Ferda

    Egypts FM rediculs himself.
    I wisch the Englisch language medias like MEM, Middle East Eye, Al Monitor etc. spare us with such news.
    I am sure that such statements from Egyptian Ministers are meant for Home consumption. Endles denials based on lies,twisted and destorted facts.
    What the sudanese FM articulated is an open secret, which is being told at every meeting of Experts in regard to Nile Water. Sudan has never had the storage capacity to fully utilize its so called Share of the Nile waters, 18,5 billion cubic meter per year.
    The Egyptian FM acknowledgis by saying “In previous years, the absorptive capacity of the Sudan for that share was incomplete. Therefore, there was an overflowing part of it which has been going to the river in Egypt without its will and with the consent of Sudan”. What has changed in Sudan in recent years, that reduced its absorptive capacity? Has Sudan decommissoned its Dams? none of that. The most redicules statement is “However, this water has been a burden and a danger to the High Dam due to the unexpected increase in its storage capacity, especially at the time of the high flood, which led Egypt to discharge these excess quantities in the river or in Toshka Lakes behind the Dam, but in vain”. Egypt is crying faul against the GERD Projekt clayming it has water destress and its water demands zerpass by far its so called share of the Nile water of 55,5 billion cubic metres. And now the additional ca 6 billion cubic metres of sudanese water, which is a free lunch is causing damage to Egypt. If it is not so serious, I would just laugh and let it go. But this Egyptian behaviour is systemic. Hundred Denials don´t create one truth.
    The fact of the matter is GERD is a realty. Sudan has a lot of advantages from it. It does not need its own Reservoirs to utilize as much Nile water as it pleases. Ethiopia will take its own share.
    Egypt has to adapt itself to the new realities. No threats no coersion would help Egypt to exercise its out of date century old Hydro-Hegemoney. Old days are gone. It is time to appreciate the reality on the ground and stop warmongering. It is time for cooperation and collaboration. Come back to NBI, the only platform, where you can take care of your interesst on equal footing with all Nile Basin Riparian states. NO Other Viable Alternatives!