clear

Creating new perspectives since 2009

Israel’s war on the United Nations

October 15, 2024 at 4:26 pm

UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres holds a press conference at the United Nations Headquarters in New York, United States on August 16, 2024 [Fatih Aktaş – Anadolu Agency]

The UN is an easy body to dislike. At times, it seems to be effusion without substance, a body with no backbone. It was conceived in a fit of post-war idealism, when egos were humbled and hatred was stemmed briefly. Built on the ruins of the Second World War, the builders were favoured over the destroyers and mischief makers, at least for a while.

With its establishment, the UN became a hostage to the political intrigues and power blocs that have continued to plague it ever since. Of particular concern was the body’s pursuit of international law protocols; their formulation, drafting and implementation. A central feature of this are the resolutions passed by various bodies, the most significant being the UN Security Council. Such measures are followed by nation states when convenient, ignored when not.

One such nation state in the mischief-making “ignoring” class is Israel. Its relationship with the UN has often been tetchy. The thinly-disguised Anti-Defamation League pro-Israel lobby group in the US admits that the international body “played a pivotal role in the establishment of the Jewish State by passing UN Resolution 181 in 1947” aka the UN Partition Plan for Palestine. The resolution, with its hefty consequences, called for “the partition of British Mandate Palestine into two states, one Jewish and one Arab.” The ADL, however, goes on to note with satisfaction the remarks in April 2007 by then UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon: “Unfortunately, because of the [Israeli-Palestinian] conflict, Israel’s been weighed down by criticism and suffered from bias – and sometimes even discrimination.”

READ: Save the Children: What we are seeing in Gaza is ‘the depths of hell’

For various periods throughout its history, Israel has felt hard done by in the international forum. The file of resolutions against it has burgeoned. Notable examples include the 1967 UN Security Council Resolution 242 which asserts, in accordance with the principles embodied in the UN Charter, that a “just and lasting peace in the Middle East” includes the withdrawal of Israel’s armed forces from territories occupied during the 1967 Six Day War and the termination of territorial claims and affirmation of sovereignty of all States in the area. Security Council Resolution 338 passed in 1973 in response to the October (Yom Kippur) War between Israel, Egypt and Syria, called on the parties to cease hostilities within 12 hours and implement Resolution 242 “in all its parts”.

Resolution 2334, passed in December 2016, particularly hurt, striking at the expansionist, displacing drive of the Jewish state through settlements in occupied territory that amount to de facto colonisation. It particularly condemned “all measures aimed at altering the demographic composition, character and status of the Palestinian Territory occupied since 1967, including East Jerusalem.” This included, among other matters, the expansion of the settlements, the transfer of Israeli settlers, the confiscation of land and the displacement of Palestinian civilians.

Instead of seeing such a measure as a clear assessment of predation in breach of international law and the principles of the UN Charter, Israel’s Ambassador to the UN, Danny Danon, called it an unnecessary reward to the Palestinians “to continue down a dangerous path they have chosen” in avoiding direct negotiations with Israel.

That Israel cared not a jot on that score hardly mattered.

A number of recent incidents reveals the poor regard in which the UN is held, especially within Israel’s warring circles. Its agency for Palestinian refugees, UNRWA, is threatened by two bills before the Israeli parliament that will significantly hamper its operations by evicting UNRWA from its premises in territories within Israel’s control. The proposed laws will also abolish any associated privileges and immunities. Having failed to convince all major donors of the agency that it should be defunded for being packed with Hamas apologists and operatives (the evidence has always been paltry on that score), the Israeli government is using a legal sledgehammer fashioned by the Knesset.

The passage of the bills, warns UN Secretary-General António Guterres, “would effectively end coordination to protect UN convoys, offices and shelters serving hundreds of thousands of people.” The provision of shelter, food and healthcare “would grind to a halt” without UNRWA. Some 600,000 children “would lose the only entity that is able to re-start education, risking the fate of an entire generation.”

OPINION: Desensitised politics is a gift for Israel’s genocide in Gaza

With Israel’s broadening campaign against Hezbollah to the north, the UN Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) is facing continuous harassment by the Israel Defence Forces (IDF). Established in 1978 by the Security Council to confirm the withdrawal of Israel from Lebanon and aid the Lebanese authorities to restore peace and security in the area, UNIFIL has been a source of endless irritation to the IDF’s and its frequent cross-border operations.

In a statement on 13 October, UNIFIL revealed that at 4.30 that morning two IDF Merkava tanks had gone about the business of destroying the main gate of their post in Ramyah, near the Israeli border. The tanks entered the compound by force, after which Israeli personnel demanded that the base turn out its lights. “The tanks left about 45 minutes later after UNIFIL protested through our liaison mechanism, saying that IDF presence was putting peacekeepers in danger.”

At 6.40 am, peacekeepers at the same post reported the firing of several smoke emitting rounds 100 metres to the north. “Despite putting on protective masks, fifteen peacekeepers suffered effects, including skin irritation and gastrointestinal reactions, after the smoke entered the camp,” said UNIFIL.

On 14 October, persisting in its approach of impeding and harrying the peacekeeping force, the IDF halted “a critical UNIFIL logistical movement near Meiss ej Jebel, denying it passage. The critical movement could not be completed.”

The UNIFIL statement goes on to remind the IDF about its obligations to ensure the safety and security of the UN peacekeepers and property. Breaching a UN position violated UN Security Council Resolution 1701 (2006), while any deliberate attack on peacekeepers is a serious violation of international humanitarian law, in addition to breaching resolution 1701.

In an almost disdainful manner, the IDF suggested that the peacekeepers had entirely misunderstood the brutal encroachment. The actions had been motivated by goodwill to evacuate soldiers wounded by an anti-tank missile. “For the sake of evacuating the wounded, two tanks drove backwards, in a place where they could not advance otherwise in light of the threat of shooting, a few metres towards the UNIFIL position.” The smokescreen had been created to aid the evacuation, while the entire operation was conducted throughout with continuous contact with the UN peacekeepers.

After a time, the dressing-up of lies becomes tatty and banal.

Typically, it fell to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to shed some light on the mendacious fog. UNIFIL, he suggested, had to withdraw its forces from southern Lebanon immediately. “It is time for you,” Netanyahu told Guterres in a pointed message, “to withdraw UNIFIL from Hezbollah strongholds and from the areas of combat.” Yet again, international law which, in this case, provides legitimacy to the UN peacekeeping operations in the area, could be treated with utter contempt with impunity.

READ: Anti-Zionism ruled a protected belief in landmark UK tribunal decision

The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Monitor.