clear

Creating new perspectives since 2009

Germany's new Anti-Semitism resolution threatens academic freedom, scholars warn

January 31, 2025 at 4:21 pm

Police forces take a protester into custody during a demonstration against Israel and in support of Palestinians in Berlin, Germany on August 31, 2024. [Erbil Başay – Anadolu Agency]

A group of prominent scholars yesterday criticised German lawmakers for passing a controversial anti-Semitism motion that could restrict academic freedoms and criticism of the Israeli government’s actions.

Prof. Michael Zurn from the Berlin Social Science Centre WZB acknowledged the need for measures to address rising anti-Semitism in Germany, but emphasized that the parliament’s resolution would not contribute to this goal.

“Firstly, it infringes on academic freedom. Secondly, it formulates a German special path in the international discussion. And thirdly, it opens up possibilities for political influence,” he told a press conference in Berlin.

He warned that this kind of political intervention and academic restriction would put international partnerships of German universities and schools at risk.

“We would actually have to subject every doctoral student or post-doc scholar to a political attitudes inquiry before inviting them as guests. This would paint a strange picture of German academia,” he added.

READ: Germany cuts off funding to 2 Israel human rights organisations over criticism of Israeli crimes in Gaza

The non-binding motion, “Resolutely Opposing Anti-Semitism and Hostility Towards Israel in Schools and Universities and Securing Free Discourse”, received broad support on Wednesday from major political parties including the Social Democratic Party (SPD), Christian Democratic Union/Christian Social Union (CDU/CSU), The Greens and the liberal Free Democratic Party (FDP).

The motion endorsed the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of anti-Semitism—a framework that human rights groups have long criticised for its potential misuse in suppressing legitimate criticism of Israeli government policies, and for incorrectly categorising such criticism as anti-Semitic.

The parliamentary measure explicitly called for blocking activities of groups promoting boycotts against Israel, including the BDS (Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions) movement, from German educational institutions.

Prof. Zurn said that, while he is also critical of the BDS movement, he views this provision in the resolution as a political intervention in the academic world—a provision which could severely restrict academic freedoms. “I have always spoken out against BDS, but the provision that these scholars, people cannot have a place at German universities seems highly problematic to me,” he said.

Prof. Ralf Michaels from the Max-Planck-Institute also voiced strong concerns about the resolution, saying lawmakers had failed to properly consider academic perspectives and input during the drafting process.

He criticised the political pressure on the academic world and said the motion, contrary to its claims, “does not protect the Jews at all”, particularly those who hold critical views of Israeli government policies.

“Jewish scientists such as Omer Bartov, Judith Butler and Amos Goldberg are likely to face difficulties conducting research in Germany with German institutions under this resolution. Students demonstrating against Israeli policy—and yes, they do exist—are already facing difficulties now in Germany,” he said.

OPINION: Desperate to appease Israel, Germany goes out of its way