Sarah Hurwitz and the human carnage no argument can break

What does it mean when the truth itself becomes unbearable? Not a distorted truth, not a manipulated image, but the unfiltered reality of what is being done in our name. Sarah Hurwitz, former speechwriter for Barack and Michelle Obama, recently offered an answer at the Jewish Federations of North America General Assembly (Mondoweiss: “Sarah Hurwitz and liberal Zionism’s hail mary” https://mondoweiss.net/2025/11/sarah-hurwitz-and-liberal-zionisms-hail-mary/). Young Jews, she said, are being exposed to “video of carnage in Gaza.” The images, she admitted, create a “wall” that no argument can penetrate.

She meant this as a problem to be solved. But let us sit with what she actually said.

The obstacle to her narrative is not misinformation but in the very act of documentation. The crisis she names is not that young people are being deceived, but that they are witnessing. And witnessing, it turns out, has consequences.

Hurwitz is thinking about this the wrong way. She sees the problem as: young people are drawing conclusions from what they see, and those conclusions make Israel look bad. In that sense, she believes the images are the enemy. The algorithm is the enemy. TikTok is the enemy. If only we could get back to when American media controlled what Americans saw, she thinks, we could control what they believe.

For decades, Western media maintained near-total control over how Israel was portrayed to American audiences. Palestinians existed primarily as abstractions—”terrorists,” “militants,” “demographic threats”—or as statistics too large to feel. The occupation was “complicated if not non-existent.”

This manufactured consent required one thing above all: control over images. As long as Americans, and by extension, all Western viewers saw Palestinians only through Israeli military footage, through carefully framed news segments, through the lens of “security,” the reality could be managed. The carnage could be hidden. Social media, however, brought that filter to an end.

When a doctor in Gaza can broadcast directly to millions, when a child’s final moments can be witnessed in real-time by a teenager in Chicago or London, the carefully constructed distance collapses. Suddenly, the abstraction becomes a person, a name, a face that will not be unseen.

READ: Army ex-spokesman says Israel lost social media battle, calls for propaganda overhaul

This is what Hurwitz mourns: the loss of control over presentation. “It used to be,” she explained, “that the news you got in America was American media, and it was pretty mainstream. You had to go to a pretty weird bookstore to find global media and fringe media.”

Read that again. The “weird bookstore” was where Palestinian voices lived. What she describes as the natural order was a system of exclusion so totalising that it had become invisible, so normalised that its disruption feels like violence.

There is a deeper confession buried in her remarks. “I want to give data and information and facts and arguments,” she said, “and they [young Jewish Americans] are just seeing in their minds: carnage.”

She is admitting that no argument can make what is happening acceptable. No rhetorical framing transforms flattened neighbourhoods into unfortunate necessities, starving children into collateral damage, mass graves into complications. The reality exceeds every justification offered for it.

What Hurwitz wants is for young people to unsee what they have seen. To watch children pulled from rubble and think “human shields.” To witness starvation and remember “right to defend itself.” To process the annihilation of hospitals, universities, mosques, churches, entire family lines, and still arrive at the conclusion that this is necessary, proportional, just.

But the images are too clear. The bodies are too many. The contradiction between what is shown and what is said has become too vast to bridge. Perhaps the most revealing moment in her remarks concerns Holocaust education. Young Jews, she complained, learned about powerful oppressors and powerless victims, and then applied that framework to what they see in Gaza. They see overwhelming military power deployed against a trapped population, and they know which side they are supposed to be on.

She presents this as a failure of education. But consider the alternative: the lesson landed. Young people learned to recognise the machinery of dehumanisation, the logic of collective punishment. They learned to refuse complicity, to stand with the vulnerable. They simply applied these principles universally, even to a state that claims exemption from moral scrutiny.

But here is what she refuses to think: maybe we should stop doing the things that look bad when people see them. If young people are looking at what Israel does and concluding that it resembles what they learned about in Holocaust education, then Israel should stop doing things that resemble what they learned about in Holocaust education.

OPINION: How Israel-First Jewish Americans plan to re-monopolise the narratives on Palestine

People often understand cruelty without being taught to identify it. You do not need Holocaust education to know that bombing unarmed people is wrong. You do not need a seminar on genocide to recognise that starving a population is monstrous. You understand this as a human being. A child understands this. When you see a powerful military bombing tent cities, displacing two million people (UNRWA Situation Reports (ongoing) https://www.unrwa.org/resources/reports/unrwa-situation-report-186-situation-gaza-strip-and-west-bank-including-east-jerusalem) and then bombing them again in their displacement, killing patients with IV fluids still attached to their arms—you know this is wrong. No algorithm taught you that. You knew it already.

What Hurwitz is really complaining about is human moral intuition itself. She wants arguments that will override what their eyes are showing them. She wants the intellectual framework to defeat the gut response.

What social media has done is democratise witnessing. Palestinians in Gaza can now narrate their own experience without passing through the editorial gatekeepers who decided which deaths were newsworthy. They can speak directly to those who were trained never to hear them. Now a student anywhere can watch a family’s home demolished in real-time. Can hear a mother’s scream that needs no translation. And they are drawing conclusions.

Here is the thing she will not say: the images are accurate. The carnage is real. The tent cities were bombed. The hospitals were targeted (https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20241221-normalisation-of-israels-war-crimes-in-gazas-hospitals-and-dehumanisation-of-palestinian-patients-must-end/). The children did starve (https://www.who.int/news/item/22-08-2025-famine-confirmed-for-first-time-in-gaza). None of this is misinformation. This is documentation.

In that sense, she has already lost. She lost the moment people could see for themselves. She lost because reality, when it is visible, speaks louder than any speechwriter.

Hurwitz was right about one thing: she does sound obscene. But not for the reasons she thinks. The obscenity is in naming the documentation of atrocity as the problem, rather than the atrocity itself. The obscenity is in mourning the loss of narrative control while bodies pile up, while children starve, while an entire people are being erased in full view of the world.

The wall of carnage will stand until the carnage stops. That is the only solution on offer. Everything else is just noise.

OPINION: Erasing the future: Gaza’s educational sociocide

The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Monitor.