Indonesia’s incremental re-engagement with Libya

A low-profile diplomatic meeting in Jakarta this month offered an instructive glimpse into how Indonesia is refining its engagement with North Africa and the wider Middle East. The Second Indonesia–Libya Joint Committee Meeting, held on 15 December 2025, did not produce dramatic announcements or sweeping pledges. Instead, it reflected a carefully calibrated effort by both countries to rebuild momentum after years of regional instability — and to do so in ways that align with Indonesia’s broader approach to the MENA region.

The session brought together delegations led by Indonesia’s vice minister for foreign affairs, Anis Matta, and Libya’s vice minister for foreign affairs and international cooperation for migration and overseas citizens, Mohamed Saeed Zidan. Officials from relevant ministries on both sides reviewed the state of bilateral relations and identified priority areas for cooperation, including trade, investment, political and diplomatic coordination, health, and technical and vocational education. These sectors are familiar pillars of Indonesia’s Middle East diplomacy, chosen less for political symbolism than for their potential to deliver gradual, practical gains.

One of the meeting’s more concrete outcomes was the initialing of a memorandum of understanding between the Indonesian Chamber of Commerce and Industry and its Libyan counterpart. Known in Indonesia as KADIN, the chamber is not a government body but a national umbrella organization representing private-sector businesses across industries. Its involvement signals an intention to place commercial actors at the center of future economic engagement, rather than relying solely on state-driven projects. For Libya, whose post-conflict recovery depends heavily on rebuilding private enterprise, this business-to-business approach offers flexibility. For Indonesia, it limits political exposure while allowing firms to assess risks on their own terms.

Another agreement reached at the meeting concerned visa exemptions for holders of diplomatic, service and special passports. While this measure does not affect ordinary travelers, it eases official mobility and reduces bureaucratic friction for government-to-government exchanges. In regions where diplomatic engagement has often been disrupted by security concerns, such facilitation can matter more than it appears, particularly for sustaining regular consultations.

READ: Libyan parliament condemns Greek call to cancel 2019 maritime border agreement with Turkey

The tone and framing of the meeting were as important as its formal outcomes. Indonesia never formally severed diplomatic relations with Libya during the years of conflict that followed the fall of Muammar el-Qaddafi. Instead, Jakarta downgraded its presence, operating with a chargé d’affaires rather than a full ambassador in Tripoli. As Anis Matta later explained, the objective was to preserve continuity while limiting exposure during a volatile period. This strategy mirrors Indonesia’s broader posture in parts of the Middle East: maintaining engagement, even at reduced levels, rather than withdrawing entirely.

Improving conditions in Libya have now allowed for a gradual reactivation of ties. Anis Matta’s visit to Libya three months prior to the Jakarta meeting, followed by Zidan’s reciprocal trip, suggests a step-by-step normalization rather than a symbolic reset. Both sides emphasized the need to “activate” existing agreements and memorandums, underscoring that the challenge lies less in signing new documents than in implementing those already on the books.

Economic cooperation remains a central aspiration, but also a test of realism. Indonesian officials have spoken of increasing trade volumes and investment, yet Libya’s fragmented governance and regulatory uncertainty continue to deter foreign businesses. The decision to channel economic engagement through chambers of commerce reflects an acknowledgment of these constraints. It allows cooperation to expand organically, depending on market conditions, rather than through politically driven commitments.

People-to-people ties offer another, often overlooked, dimension. Indonesian officials estimate that around 5,000 Libyan tourists visit Indonesia each year, a figure that exceeds the number of Indonesians traveling to Libya. These exchanges, driven largely by education, medical services and religious tourism, hint at social linkages that could deepen if stability improves.

Symbolic gestures also reinforced the atmosphere of the meeting. Libya’s delegation conveyed condolences for recent natural disasters in Sumatra, while Indonesian officials acknowledged Libya’s long recovery from conflict. Zidan’s emphasis on effective follow-up reflected a shared awareness that bilateral mechanisms in the MENA context often falter at the implementation stage.

For Indonesia, engagement with Libya fits into a wider regional strategy: remain present, avoid entanglement in domestic political disputes, and expand cooperation where conditions permit. For Libya, strengthening ties with Indonesia broadens its diplomatic options and supports its gradual return to normal international relations. The Jakarta meeting did not transform the relationship overnight, but it demonstrated how cautious, process-driven diplomacy continues to shape Indonesia’s role in the Middle East and North Africa.

OPINION: Why Indonesia’s two-state stance works in Israel’s favour

The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Monitor.