Permanent 5 members clash in UN Security Council over Iran sanctions snapback

The five permanent members of the UN Security Council clashed Thursday during a high-stakes session about the legal validity of international sanctions against Iran and the reimposition of UN sanctions under the 2015 nuclear accord’s “snapback” provision, Anadolu reports.

The snapback clause, established under the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), was designed to automatically reinstate UN Chapter VII sanctions if Iran breached the deal, intentionally bypassing the veto power of permanent council members.

“The mechanism for reinstating previously adopted Security Council resolutions on Iran, a mechanism set forth in Resolution 2231, was not activated, and this for a whole host of legal and procedural reasons,” said the Russian representative, demanding a procedural vote to block a scheduled briefing on the 1737 Sanctions Committee.

Moscow argued that UN Resolution 2231, which endorsed the nuclear deal, expired Oct. 18, 2025, and insisted that the non-proliferation agenda item was struck off the council’s list of active matters that day. The Russian envoy maintained that the 1737 Committee ceased to exist in 2015 and that no legal grounds remain to discuss its “so-called work.”

The Chinese representative supported the move, asserting that the council presidency lacks the mandate to draft or deliver a 90-day report. Warning against unilateral action, Beijing stressed, “A few members, in disregard of differences, insist on forcibly reimposing the Council sanctions against Iran and convening Council meetings under a removed agenda item.” The envoy warned that the steps deepen institutional division and impede a political settlement, expressing “grave concern” and “strong opposition” against the moves.

Western delegations firmly rejected the challenge, arguing that the sanctions regime had been legally revived following Iranian breaches.

READ: US sanctions 36 Iran-linked targets under ‘Economic D-Day’ campaign

“The United Kingdom, with France and Germany, initiated the snapback mechanism in full accordance with Security Council Resolution 2231,” said the British representative, explaining that European powers acted because of Iran’s “significant non-performance” under the 2015 nuclear pact. London noted that the process concluded Sept. 28, 2025, leaving six Chapter VII resolutions in effect for nearly a year.

The French representative affirmed that council resolutions were restored alongside the committee’s mandate to report every 90 days.

“Regardless of such politically driven matters, the facts are the facts. The 1737 Committee exists,” said the US representative, accusing Russia and China of attempting to undermine council decisions to protect Tehran. The American diplomat noted that the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) confirmed Iran remains non-compliant with its Comprehensive Safeguards Agreement.

The council voted 11-2 in favor of adopting the provisional agenda, with two abstentions, defeating the Russian and Chinese bid to halt the meeting. Under UN Security Council rules, procedural votes cannot be blocked by a permanent member’s veto and require a minimum of nine affirmative votes to pass.

READ: China says dialogue, not military pressure, can solve US-Iran conflict

Permanent members trade accusations after vote

Moscow denounced the briefing as an illegitimate exercise and an “inefficient use” of council resources, with the Russian representative describing it as a “flagrant procedural breach.”

The Russian envoy accused Washington and Israel of conducting strikes on “peaceful” facilities under IAEA safeguards, warning that the “illegal and reckless actions” risked provoking a wider regional catastrophe, while dismissing a new IAEA Board of Governors resolution referring Iran to the council as “politicized.”

Beijing maintained that lasting solutions require addressing the root causes of regional tensions. The “United States’ unilateral withdrawal from the JCPOA, its use of force against Iran twice during the negotiation process, and its pursuit of a policy of maximum pressure against Iran are the primary causes of the current complex and intractable situation in the Middle East and the Iranian nuclear issue,” argued the Chinese envoy. China defended lran’s “legitimate right to the peaceful use of nuclear energy,” and said it acknowledges “Iran’s repeated commitments not to develop nuclear weapons.”

“Iran is the only country without nuclear weapons to enrich uranium to this level,” said the British envoy, criticizing Tehran for reportedly stockpiling more than 400 kilograms (882 pounds) of uranium enriched to 60% without “any credible civilian justification.” London accused Iran of barring UN inspectors from all nuclear facilities since June 2025, sparing only the Bushehr plant, reiterating that a negotiated settlement remains the only durable path.

Rejecting safety arguments raised by Tehran for barring inspectors, the US representative said UN personnel continue to operate safely inside war-torn Ukraine, which IAEA director Rafael Grossi noted as a “worse and more constant war zone.” The American diplomat accused Moscow and Beijing of trying to shield a state whose nuclear program is progressing “in the dark.”

France underlined Tehran’s stockpile, warning that the amount is potentially sufficient for about 10 explosive nuclear devices.

READ: Israeli defense minister renews threat to strike Iran’s energy facilities