Signing the protocol to surrender the world’s throne

When Donald Trump sat in the White House surrounded by Sundar Pichai, Mark Zuckerberg, Elon Musk, Jensen Huang, Greg Brockman, and Dario Amodei, the scene was far more than an administrative meeting between an American president and executives of major tech corporations. It was a grand, awe-inspiring theatrical display laden with questions for the twenty-first century—a formal attempt by the head of history’s most formidable political power to assert his authority before the masters of the incoming economic and cognitive power. These are men who possess neither armies nor legislative mandates, yet they hold the digital keys to human consciousness and the future.

Last Tuesday, Trump summoned these titans under his capacity as the world’s reigning political sovereign. He even went so far as to sign an executive decree mandating the use of the term “Superintelligence” (SI) instead of “Artificial Intelligence” (AI)—a rhetorical justification that reflects the sheer scale and nature of this shift in power. Yet behind this political showmanship and the presidential zeal to form an oversight committee and sign “morally binding” agreements with companies whose programs have already slipped out of control in documented security breaches, a far more fundamental and brutal question hides: Who actually governs the world? And can political authority still retain its throne when the entirety of human existence is being re-engineered in Silicon Valley laboratories?

The “ethical” agreement signed over last Tuesday’s presidential lunch appears to be nothing more than a tactical distraction—as legal scholar Kimberlee Weatherall from the University of Sydney rightly described it—since it allowed the companies themselves to “define what constitutes AI safety” without establishing penalties for violations. Meanwhile, as the political administration attempts to absorb mounting local outrage against the construction of energy-greedy data centers through promises of “financial happiness,” experts broadly agree that traditional authority stands helpless before a technology that some of its own pioneers warn could spiral out of control and wipe out humanity within a decade.

This ongoing duality between Trump and superintelligent algorithms confronts us with an unprecedented crisis in political philosophy. Politicians operate under the illusion that they hold the reins of direction simply because they issue decrees, whereas tech moguls realize that actual governance no longer flows from ballot boxes or parliamentary seats, but from the “petabytes” that recalibrate human behavior, power, and emotions at every single moment.

Thus, it appears we are in desperate need of a “contemporary Aristotle” to redefine and deconstruct the philosophy of what we do under the guise of “free time.” We inhabit an era in which human leisure has been completely expropriated.

Much of the time we naively imagine enjoying as free individuals is, in truth, nothing more than “unpaid labor”—feeding AI engines and supplying the big data that makes tech barons ever wealthier and more influential.

READ: Trump willing to offer Iran sanctions relief for nuclear progress: Reports

Digital empires have confiscated human leisure and transformed it into a field of perpetual production that never stops, even while we are in our beds. Whether Sam Altman declares that “the best version of AI does not consist of turning people into cogs in a giant machine,” or Zuckerberg attempts to reassure the public, reality confirms that we have already become soft cogs supplying these algorithms with fuel without even realizing it.

The greatest illusion under which politics operates today is its gamble on statutory laws to prevent technology from leading the world. The politician feeds on legislation that requires months and years to be enacted, whereas algorithms evolve and change the rules of the game in fractions of a second. When the American President is forced to redefine the term from “Artificial Intelligence” to “Superintelligence,” he is not exercising the power of naming; rather, he is weakly submitting to a reality engineered by others behind closed doors. Politics has come to play the role of a “belated commentator” on a train traveling at the speed of light—retaining the right to issue statements and address journalists, but lacking the button to stop the engine.

Added to this is the fact that the political conditions of any state—including America—remain tethered to electoral cycles and partisan shifts, rendering a president’s authority temporary and bound by time limits. In contrast, superintelligence networks and their data centers constitute an “unelected, cumulative authority” that recognizes no borders and is immune to electoral changes. Politicians come and go, but the algorithms of prediction and cognitive extraction remain, their power compounding daily.

The one who truly governs is the one who possesses the absolute power to dictate thought and shape the daily desires of millions, not the one who borrows a microphone to tell journalists he signed an “ethical pledge” with the moguls.

This gathering between Trump and the barons of Silicon Valley is nothing short of a silent protocol for the handover and takeover of the world’s throne. Politics retains the ability to mobilize mass emotion, but technology holds the master key to the minds where that emotion is stored. Unless the world wakes up to put an end to the confiscation of free time and the engineering of human consciousness, we will soon awaken to the reality that the “White House,” “Downing Street,” and the “Élysée” are merely historic architectural facades, receiving their daily operational instructions from the “Superintelligence” servers spanning the globe.

Thus, the real question that ought to be directed today to the CEOs of tech companies before heads of state becomes: If we agree that we know who holds sway today, what about tomorrow? And will those who control human cognition and supreme computational power ever yield that authority to a politician whose shadow fades with the end of his electoral term?

Historically, genuine power has never surrendered its throne voluntarily. The lessons of history confirm that politics can wage wars and sign laws, but technology is what alters human nature and dictates the compass of existence.

The meeting hosted by the White House was not the dawn of a new regulatory era so much as a declaration of presidential anxiety—the angst of a political ruler who witnesses with his own eyes how the historic empire of state power is turning into mere lingering shadows, while “Superintelligence” steps forward to claim the real throne of the world, holding sway over the economy, emotion, time, and destiny.

OPINION: Withdrawal and non-withdrawal: The naivete of comparing Iraq to Afghanistan

The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Monitor.