Flavio Bolsonaro’s first-round lead in Brazil alarms Palestine supporters

The strong first-round performance of right-wing presidential candidate Flavio Bolsonaro has raised questions over the future of Brazil’s policy towards Palestine, as President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva heads into a closely contested run-off.

Bolsonaro secured around 47 per cent of the vote, compared with roughly 45 per cent for Lula, outperforming several pre-election polls and reinforcing broader gains by right-wing forces in congressional and regional races.

For supporters of Palestine, the result has made Brazil’s election about more than domestic politics.

Under Lula, Brazil has remained a strong supporter of Palestinian statehood and self-determination, while openly criticising Israeli settlement expansion and the war in Gaza. Flavio Bolsonaro, on the other hand, has promised much closer ties with Israel and has backed moving Brazil’s embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, raising concerns over a possible shift in Brasilia’s position.

Those concerns were reinforced by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who welcomed Bolsonaro’s first-round lead and said he hoped to restore the “extraordinary friendship” between Israel and Brazil. He also wished Bolsonaro a “great victory” in the run-off, underlining how much is at stake diplomatically. A Bolsonaro presidency could bring a rapid improvement in Brazil-Israel relations after years of tension under Lula.

Brazil Could Be NEXT to FLIP to a Pro-Israel Government

This does NOT seem Organic

Lula was leading the polls just weeks ago. Now Bolsonaro has MAGICALLY surged ahead. Brazil is also investigating possible U.S. interference in the election.

One by one, South America is being FLIPPED.

— Ryan Rozbiani (@RyanRozbiani) October 4, 2026

Brazilian activist Fabio Bosco believes Bolsonaro’s strong showing reflects both an entrenched far-right constituency and wider frustration over Brazil’s economic conditions. According to Bosco, the far right has consolidated the support of roughly 30 %of the Brazilian population, while dissatisfaction over the rising cost of living, household indebtedness and low wages has created a broader pool of frustrated voters.

“Flavio Bolsonaro’s vote comes from two main sources: the consolidation of the far right and popular dissatisfaction with the economic and social situation,” Bosco told MEMO, pointing in particular to living costs, debt and wages as factors shaping voter sentiment.

For supporters of Palestine, the Brazilian election is not only about who will govern the country, but also about the direction Brazil may take internationally. Under Lula, Brazil has used its diplomatic weight to support Palestinian statehood, defend the right to self-determination and criticise Israeli settlement expansion and the scale of the war in Gaza. His government has also continued to back a two-state solution and broader international recognition of Palestine.

Flavio Bolsonaro represents a very different approach. He has made clear that, if elected, he would seek much closer ties with Israel and has supported moving Brazil’s embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. Such a move would signal a major change in Brazil’s current policy and could place Brasilia much closer to the Israeli government.

Brazilian activist Fabio Bosco sees this possible shift as part of a wider geopolitical realignment. He argues that Flavio Bolsonaro’s closeness to US President Donald Trump could influence Brazil’s position on the Middle East, particularly on Palestine. In Bosco’s view, a Bolsonaro government would be less supportive of the Palestinian cause and more closely aligned with Israel.

READ: Brazil’s Lula warns of lasting impact of Gaza war and criticises UN inaction

“If he wins the election, the Brazilian government will distance itself from Palestine and move closer to Israel,” Bosco said, linking that possible change to Bolsonaro’s political alignment with Trump.

Brazilian vote count abroad.

BOLSONARO WON IN ISRAEL, LULA WON IN PALESTINE.

🇮🇱 Israel:
🟢 Flávio Bolsonaro: 523 votes (74.3%)
🔴 Lula: 92 votes (13.1%)

🇵🇸 Palestine:
🔴 Lula: 1,078 votes (93.09%)
🟢 Flávio Bolsonaro: 46 votes (3.97%) https://t.co/EnwZwei1TX

— Straturka (@straturka) October 4, 2026

The election is also being watched closely by Brazil’s large Palestinian and wider Arab communities, which have deep social, cultural and economic roots in the country. At this stage, there is no clear evidence that a change of government would directly affect the legal or civil rights of Palestinians or Brazilians of Palestinian origin.

The concern is more about the wider political atmosphere, and whether a government that is more closely aligned with Washington and Israel could make the environment less comfortable for Palestine solidarity groups, as well as for Arab and Muslim communities.

Bosco points out that Brazil’s Arab community is large and that Arab countries are important trading partners for Brazil, factors that could limit how far any government would be willing to shift foreign policy. Still, he worries that closer alignment with Trump could give more space to anti-Muslim rhetoric and political currents inside the country.

He also points to the Tri-Border Area between Brazil, Argentina and Paraguay, home to a sizeable Arab-origin business community. The region has repeatedly come under international scrutiny over security allegations, and Bosco fears that a more hardline political climate could bring renewed pressure and suspicion towards traders and local Arab communities there.

In his assessment, a stronger pro-Israel orientation in Brasilia could intensify political and security pressure on some merchants and organisations in the region. He also argues that groups advocating closer ties with Israel are gaining influence in Brazilian conservative politics.

Bosco goes further, expressing concern that figures strongly aligned with Israel could gain positions in a future Bolsonaro administration and that this could create a more difficult political environment for anti-Zionist activists.

These are Bosco’s political assessments rather than established outcomes, and the composition or policies of any future Bolsonaro government would only become clear if he wins the presidency and forms an administration.

For decades, Latin America has been among the world’s most critical regions when it came to Israel’s systemic human rights abuses in Palestine.

But following a wave of elections in 2025–2026, the region’s political landscape is shifting, with several governments taking a much more favourable stance towards Tel Aviv despite its ongoing genocide in Gaza.

In recent months, the new leaders of Chile, Colombia, Honduras, Peru, and Venezuela have all moderated their positions towards Israel, joining Argentina and Bolivia, which have reinforced their cooperation with Tel Aviv since 2023.

Right now, all eyes are on Brazil, where a presidential election in October could reshape the political balance in the region for years to come.

— TRT World (@trtworld) September 11, 2026

Bosco places Brazil’s election within a wider political cycle that has shaped Latin America for years. In his view, the region has repeatedly swung between progressive governments associated with the “pink wave” and conservative administrations often described as part of a “blue wave”.

“Over the past 20 years, progressive pink waves have alternated with conservative blue waves in Latin America. Currently, we are experiencing a blue wave,” he said.

He also sees Donald Trump’s approach to the region as part of that picture. Bosco argues that Washington continues to treat Latin America as a strategic sphere of influence and that a stronger US push in the region could trigger fresh political resistance.

“We will certainly see significant popular resistance against Trump’s neocolonialism,” he said, suggesting that the current shift to the right should be seen as another stage in Latin America’s political pendulum rather than a permanent realignment.

For Palestine, that regional shift matters. Several Latin American governments have historically supported Palestinian statehood and taken critical positions on Israeli policies in the occupied territories. If Brazil were to change course, Palestine could lose an important diplomatic voice in the region, although Latin America’s political history suggests that such shifts are rarely permanent.

Much will also depend on what happens after the election. Campaign promises do not automatically become government policy, and Brazil’s foreign relations are shaped by Congress, the diplomatic establishment, economic interests and wider international pressures.

For Palestinians, the concern is not that Brazil’s policy would change immediately, but that the country could slowly move away from the strong support it has given to Palestinian rights in recent years.

BLOG: Chile’s envoy to Israel at center of political storm over remarks about Palestinians

The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Monitor.