Yemen’s latest escalation shows why the country needs a political settlement, not another military cycle

Yemen is once again confronting a dangerous escalation in a war that has repeatedly demonstrated the limits of military solutions. The latest fighting, particularly along the country’s western coast and in the vicinity of the Bab Al-Mandab Strait, is a reminder that Yemen’s conflict has never been simply a contest between two military forces. It is a complex political crisis involving competing national projects, regional interests, economic grievances and unresolved questions about the future structure of the Yemeni state.

In September, the United Nations warned that fighting had intensified along Yemen’s west coast as Houthi forces advanced towards the Bab Al-Mandab Strait, while government forces launched a counteroffensive on several fronts. The UN also described the situation around the strait as increasingly volatile and stressed the importance of preventing further escalation and protecting freedom of navigation.

The humanitarian consequences have been immediate. According to the World Health Organization, more than 122,000 people were displaced by the recent escalation across eight governorates, while thousands of casualties were reported between early August and mid-September.

Many of those displaced had already experienced displacement during previous phases of the war, demonstrating how each new military cycle deepens an existing humanitarian crisis rather than creating a new one from scratch.

Yet the most important lesson from the latest escalation is political rather than military. Yemen has repeatedly experienced periods in which the guns became quieter without the political disputes being resolved. Such pauses can be valuable because they save lives and create space for diplomacy, but a ceasefire by itself cannot settle competing claims over political representation, territory, resources and state authority.

The international community therefore faces a fundamental question: what kind of peace is being sought for Yemen?

READ: Yemen casualties rising by around 100 per day amid escalating conflict: WHO

If peace means simply stopping the fighting between the principal military actors, then previous experience suggests that such an arrangement may prove temporary.

But if peace means creating a political framework capable of accommodating Yemen’s different regions, political forces and competing interests, then the process must be considerably broader than negotiations between two sides.

This distinction is particularly important when considering southern Yemen. The political question in the south cannot simply be postponed until after an agreement between the Houthis and other Yemeni forces. Southern political aspirations, questions of representation, local governance and control over resources have become central components of Yemen’s wider political crisis. Ignoring these questions would not remove them; it would merely postpone their confrontation to a later stage.

At the same time, Yemen’s economic collapse has become inseparable from its political crisis. Years of conflict have weakened state institutions, disrupted public services and deepened the dependence of millions of Yemenis on humanitarian assistance.

Economic deterioration also creates political instability because citizens judge political arrangements not only by constitutional formulas or diplomatic agreements, but by whether those arrangements provide salaries, electricity, healthcare, education, security and opportunities for a dignified life.

The international response must therefore move beyond the assumption that a political agreement can be implemented independently of economic recovery. A sustainable settlement requires an economic track running alongside the political process, including arrangements for public revenues, salaries, essential services, infrastructure and the management of national resources.

The strategic importance of Yemen adds another layer to this challenge. The Bab Al-Mandab Strait connects the Red Sea with the Gulf of Aden and forms part of one of the world’s most important maritime corridors. The recent fighting has therefore generated international concern not only because of its consequences for Yemenis, but also because instability around the strait can affect regional security and international navigation.

However, securing maritime routes cannot substitute for resolving the political conflict inside Yemen. Military measures may address immediate threats to shipping, but they cannot determine how political power should be distributed among Yemenis or how competing regional interests should be accommodated within a future political order.

READ: 71,000 children displaced in Yemen in 3 weeks amid escalating conflict: UNICEF

This is why the international community needs to reconsider the architecture of the peace process itself. Yemen should not be approached as though it has a single dispute with a single solution. The country requires a political process capable of addressing several interconnected questions simultaneously: the relationship between the central government and local authorities, the future political status of the south, the integration or restructuring of military forces, the distribution of national resources, economic recovery and the relationship between Yemen and the regional powers whose interests have become deeply involved in its conflict.

Such a process will undoubtedly be difficult. But complexity is not an argument for returning to a narrower model of negotiations. On the contrary, the complexity of the conflict is precisely why a broader political framework is necessary.

The latest escalation should therefore be understood as a warning. Every new military round increases the humanitarian cost, weakens institutions and makes the political landscape more fragmented. The longer the conflict continues, the more difficult it becomes to construct a political settlement that all major stakeholders can accept.

Yemen does not need another temporary arrangement that pauses the conflict while leaving its central political questions unresolved. It needs a settlement that recognises the realities that have emerged during more than a decade of war and gives Yemenis a credible political path away from repeated cycles of escalation.

The choice is not simply between war and peace. The deeper question is whether Yemen can move from managing conflict to addressing its causes.

For that to happen, diplomacy must become broader than the battlefield, and peace must become more ambitious than a ceasefire. Only then can Yemen begin the difficult transition from a country trapped in a cycle of war to one capable of building a political order in which its different regions and communities have a meaningful stake in the future.

OPINION: From war to statehood: A roadmap to ending the Yemeni conflict

The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Monitor.