Iran seeks stronger US guarantees for revival of 2015 nuclear deal

Iran needs stronger guarantees from Washington for the revival of a 2015 nuclear deal, its Foreign Minister said in Moscow on Wednesday, adding that the UN atomic watchdog should drop its “politically motivated probes” of Tehran’s nuclear work, Reuters reports.

After 16 months of indirect talks between Tehran and Washington, EU Foreign Policy Chief, Josep Borrell, said on 8 August that the EU had laid down a final offer to overcome an impasse for the revival of the agreement.

Iran’s top diplomat, Hossein Amirabdollahian, said Tehran was carefully reviewing Washington’s response to the text, which was conveyed to Iran last week by the EU, as coordinator of the nuclear talks.

“Iran is carefully reviewing the EU-drafted text … We need stronger guarantees from the other party to have a sustainable deal,” Amirabdollahian told a joint news conference with his Russian counterpart in Moscow.

Amirabdollahian did not elaborate on “stronger guarantees”, but during months of talks with Washington in Vienna, Tehran demanded US assurances that no future American president would abandon the deal as former US President Donald Trump did in 2018.

But US President Joe Biden cannot provide such ironclad assurances because the deal is a political understanding rather than a legally binding treaty.

The man who ultimately matters in Iran’s nuclear dispute with the West, Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, has not commented on the nuclear talks in his public speeches for months.

READ: Reviving nuclear deal subject to ending IAEA inquiry, Iran president

It was the bite of US, EU and UN sanctions over Tehran’s nuclear programme that forced Khamenei to give tentative backing to the 2015 pact between Tehran and major powers that curbed the country’s nuclear programme in exchange for lifting sanctions.

But three years later, Trump exited the pact and re-imposed harsh sanctions on Iran, prompting Tehran to violate the pact’s nuclear limits, such as rebuilding stockpiles of enriched uranium, refining it to higher fissile purity and installing advanced centrifuges to speed up output.

“It will be a massive embarrassment for the Supreme Leader if Washington pulls out of the deal again,” said a former Iranian official. “That is one of the reasons behind Tehran’s insistence on this issue.”

The nuclear deal appeared near revival in March. But indirect talks between Tehran and Washington then broke down over several issues, including Tehran’s insistence that the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) closed its probes into uranium traces found at three undeclared sites before the nuclear pact is revived.

“The agency should close this case … Such politically motivated demands are unacceptable for Iran,” said Amirabdollahian.

Tehran’s demand risks hurting efforts to save the pact. An Iranian official, speaking on condition of anonymity, told Reuters that closure of the IAEA’s investigation is “the Supreme Leader’s red line”.