Egypt’s energy paradox: Importing LNG, exporting influence

Egypt faces an unusual paradox. A country that once presented itself as the gas hub of the Eastern Mediterranean now depends increasingly on liquefied natural gas imports to fuel its power stations and supply its industries. Yet Cairo continues to derive part of its regional influence from energy infrastructure, geography and transit networks.

At first glance, this may appear to signal the decline of Egypt’s energy power. The reality is more complex. Egypt is moving from a model in which power was based primarily on resource ownership to one in which infrastructure, routes and strategic points of connection matter increasingly.

The central question is whether Egypt can continue exporting energy influence while importing more LNG.

From self-sufficiency to renewed imports

The discovery of the Zohr gas field in 2015 strengthened expectations that Egypt could meet domestic demand and become a reliable exporter in the Eastern Mediterranean. Rising production, the reactivation of the Idku and Damietta liquefaction terminals and the resumption of LNG exports placed Cairo at the centre of emerging regional energy plans.

That period did not last. Declining output from several fields, rising electricity consumption, population growth, energy-intensive industrial development and constraints on upstream investment disrupted the country’s gas balance.

Egyptian production has fallen significantly from its 2021 peak, producing a gradual shift from LNG exporter to importer.

Official documents reviewed by Reuters indicate that Egypt’s total gas imports — including pipeline supplies from Israel and LNG cargoes — could reach approximately 1.08 trillion cubic feet between July 2026 and June 2027. Cairo is also negotiating multi-year LNG contracts with major energy companies in an effort to gain greater protection from spot-market volatility and geopolitical disruption.

Such contracts could strengthen security of supply, but they would also increase import costs and place additional pressure on Egypt’s foreign currency reserves, public finances and debt-burdened economy. Imports have therefore become both a security necessity and an economic vulnerability.

Infrastructure instead of reserves

Declining domestic production does not necessarily mean the end of Egypt’s regional energy role. The country possesses assets that its neighbours cannot reproduce quickly: liquefaction terminals at Idku and Damietta, an extensive pipeline network, floating storage and regasification units, the Suez Canal, the SUMED pipeline and access to both the Mediterranean and Red Seas.

These assets enable Egypt to play a role disproportionate to the size of its own reserves. Gas produced elsewhere can enter Egypt, be processed and liquefied in its facilities, and then shipped to European or Asian markets. Under this model, Egypt need not be the principal producer. It controls the route, processing capacity and connection to international markets.

Egyptian-Cypriot agreements concerning the potential transportation of gas from the offshore Cronos and Aphrodite fields illustrate the importance of this role. Current plans envisage gas from Cronos reaching Egypt’s facilities later this decade before being exported through the Damietta terminal. For Cyprus, building independent liquefaction facilities would be costly and time-consuming, while Egypt offers existing capacity and quicker access to global markets.

READ: Egypt ‘will not allow’ any party to control Nile water flows: Egyptian source

In the emerging energy order, influence does not necessarily result from producing more. It can also arise from controlling routes, processing facilities and points of connection. Egypt is becoming less a major gas producer than an energy broker: a state that generates geopolitical value by managing the movement of resources.

Its regional weight is therefore no longer determined solely by the volume of its reserves, but by its ability to manage energy flows.

By positioning itself at the intersection of Eastern Mediterranean producers and European consumers, Cairo is developing a form of influence rooted more in interdependence than in self-sufficiency.

Dependence on Israel: Egypt’s strategic vulnerability

This model is not without risk. Part of Egypt’s gas balance now depends on imports from Israel’s Tamar and Leviathan fields. The planned expansion of Leviathan is also intended to increase supplies to regional markets, including Egypt.

Against the backdrop of the Gaza war and continuing political tensions between Cairo and Tel Aviv, this dependence has acquired significance beyond energy trade. Any disruption to Israeli gas flows could affect electricity generation, industrial activity and the cost of Egypt’s LNG imports.

Here, the paradox deepens. Facilities that serve as instruments of regional leverage can simultaneously become channels through which geopolitical volatility is transmitted. Consequently, part of Egypt’s security of supply has become tied to the uninterrupted flow of gas across its eastern border.As Egypt’s role as a processing and re-export centre expands, the security and diversity of its incoming supplies will become increasingly important. Its energy influence is real, but not unlimited. It operates within a regional system over which Cairo does not exercise complete control.

The domestic cost of regional influence

This complex architecture of energy and diplomacy confronts difficult economic realities within Egypt itself. Rising LNG imports place considerable pressure on foreign currency reserves and increase the cost of electricity generation and industrial production.

To improve supply flexibility during periods of peak demand, Egypt has expanded its receiving capacity to four floating storage and regasification units. Together, these FSRUs provide approximately 2.7 billion cubic feet per day of regasification capacity. This system is essential for preventing shortages, but it also demonstrates the depth of the country’s import dependence.

If LNG is purchased with foreign currency, consumed domestically at subsidised prices and fails to generate sufficient export value, Egypt’s energy strategy could shift from a strategic asset to a costly financial commitment.

Egypt’s success cannot therefore be measured simply by cargo numbers, pipelines or regional agreements. The more important test is whether this model can simultaneously protect household energy security, industrial competitiveness and financial stability.Cairo needs to revive domestic production, reduce the use of gas in power generation through faster renewable-energy deployment and diversify its external suppliers. Without these three elements, Egyptian energy diplomacy risks becoming less an instrument of power than a mechanism for managing scarcity.

From gas hub to energy broker

Egypt’s future may lie not in recovering the gas abundance of the past, but in redefining its regional energy role. Strategic relevance no longer depends solely on reserves or export volumes; it increasingly rests on the ability to connect suppliers, markets and transit routes.

Cairo’s position will ultimately depend on whether it can balance domestic security of supply, diversified foreign partnerships and the strategic use of its existing assets. If it succeeds, rising LNG imports need not signify failure. They could form part of a wider architecture through which Egypt provides access, connectivity and regional leverage.

Egypt’s energy paradox is ultimately a test of a new form of power in the Middle East: one in which states may produce fewer resources, yet remain central by controlling the networks through which those resources move.

OPINION: Can China turn energy dependence into diplomatic power in the Middle East?

The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Monitor.