The politics of gratitude: The corruption no one sees

Not all political corruption begins with money. Sometimes, it begins with success. Public imagination has long been trained to look for corruption in suitcases of cash, shady contracts, and secret deals. Yet some of the most consequential distortions of political judgment emerge from a far subtler source: a politician’s emotional attachment to a project they helped create.

This hidden dynamic lay beneath the recent controversy surrounding Andy Burnham’s comments on Manchester City. After initially suggesting that the club deserved fair treatment before later reaffirming that no institution stands above the rules, Burnham found himself at the center of a debate that extended far beyond football.

At first glance, the story appeared to involve a politician defending a football club or perhaps its wealthy owners. In reality, something more interesting was taking place. Burnham was defending, consciously or otherwise, part of his own political story.

The transformation of Manchester over the past two decades has become one of Britain’s most celebrated urban success stories. Manchester City’s ownership was not solely responsible for that transformation, but it undeniably became part of it.

Investments around the Etihad complex and across large sections of East Manchester helped reinforce a narrative of renewal that politicians, civic leaders, and business interests collectively embraced. For Burnham, separating the success of modern Manchester from his own political identity has become increasingly difficult.

This is not primarily an ethical problem. It is a human one.

People instinctively defend the institutions, ideas, and projects that have given meaning to their lives. Politicians are especially vulnerable to this tendency because politics is ultimately a profession obsessed with legacy. Few enter public life merely to exercise power. Most hope to leave behind a lasting achievement. The moment that achievement comes under scrutiny, criticism of the project begins to feel like criticism of the self.

Britain has witnessed this phenomenon before.

Tony Blair spent years trapped within the narrative of “New Labour” and the promise of a modernised Britain. The project was initially so successful that its architect struggled to recognise its deeper flaws. This became most visible in the Iraq War.

Blair’s persistence was not simply a matter of defending a policy. Over time, the war became intertwined with his broader conception of leadership and international responsibility. Retreat no longer meant revising a political decision. It meant acknowledging that one of the defining chapters of his public life may have been built upon a profound misjudgement.

A similar pattern can be observed in Boris Johnson’s relationship with Brexit. Long after leaving office, Johnson has remained attached to the project not merely because he believes in its outcomes but because Brexit became inseparable from his political identity. It delivered power, fame, and a place in history. To distance himself from it would require a form of self-criticism that few politicians are willing to undertake.

Yet this phenomenon extends beyond individuals.

Governments fall in love with their achievements. Cities fall in love with their redevelopment schemes. Nations fall in love with the narratives they construct about themselves.

READ: UAE warns UK over potential fallout from Manchester City sanctions: Report

At a certain point, success ceases to be a project and becomes a creed.

And that is when the trouble begins.

The paradox is that failure often encourages self-examination, while success produces the illusion of infallibility. A failed policy invites scrutiny. A successful one tends to acquire defenders. The more celebrated an achievement becomes, the more difficult it is to assess honestly.

The true responsibility of a statesman is not to adore achievements but to question them. It is not to protect them from criticism but to subject them to it. A good engineer is not the person who loves a building most. It is the person who knows where it might collapse.

Modern politics, however, rewards precisely the opposite behaviour. It rewards the conversion of political accomplishments into heroic narratives. Eventually, the narrative becomes more valuable than reality itself. Protecting the legacy becomes more important than examining its weaknesses.

This is why one of the most dangerous forms of political corruption is not financial corruption but what might be called the corruption of gratitude.

A politician becomes indebted to a project, a business leader, an idea, a movement, or even an electorate that helped create their success. Once that bond is formed, impartial judgment begins to erode. Not because of bribery or coercion, but because emotional loyalty quietly replaces critical distance.

The politician who takes a bribe can be exposed.

The politician imprisoned by personal success is far more difficult to detect.

In many cases, such individuals sincerely believe they are acting in the public interest. They do not recognize their own bias because they are not protecting a benefactor. They are protecting a cherished part of themselves.

Nor is this tendency confined to politics. Revolutionaries often become prisoners of the narratives they once created. Writers become captives of their most celebrated books. Leaders cling to decisions that history has already judged harshly because they can no longer separate the truth from their own reflection in it.

This is what makes the Burnham episode more interesting than Manchester City itself.

The fundamental question is not whether the club’s owners are good or bad, nor whether the club is guilty or innocent. The deeper question is what happens when a politician can no longer distinguish between the interests of a city and the story they tell themselves about their role in its success.

That is where the quiet tragedy of politics begins.

And it is also where the most elusive form of corruption emerges.

Not from the pocket, but from the heart.

OPINION: Political failure, not economic shock, unmasks Iraq

The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Monitor.