clear

Creating new perspectives since 2009

Does Trump see Gaza as a business opportunity or a dispossession project?

February 6, 2025 at 10:00 pm

United States President Donald Trump (R) hosts Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (L) in the White House in Washington DC., United States on February 04, 2025 [Avi Ohayon (GPO)/Handout/Anadolu Agency]

A friend texted to ask if I had watched the joint press conference held by Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu. “Fortunately, I did not watch it live,” I wrote back. It took me nearly 24 hours to be in the right state of mind to endure watching two narcissists standing on stage, lavishing praise upon each other.

As I listened carefully to Trump’s opening remarks, I also caught Netanyahu’s sneaky eye movements at key points. With a smug expression on his face, he repeatedly cast stealthy glances at Ron Dermer, Israel’s Strategic Affairs Minister, as if silently acknowledging him for crafting Trump’s words. It was evident that Trump’s speech bore the unmistakable imprint of the Israeli minister.

I watched Netanyahu, an indicted war criminal, skilfully exploit Trump’s narcissism through calculated flattery.

Their interactions were not just awkward; they were profoundly revealing. Netanyahu’s effusive praise was a calculated move, designed to keep Trump firmly in his corner and ensure continued support for Israel’s policies.

Trump, for his part, appeared more focused on basking in the admiration than grappling with the complex realities of Israel’s destruction of Gaza and the lives of more than two million human beings. When he spoke, his sentences were often disjointed, filled with rambling phrases and devoid of substantive insight, highlighting his preoccupation with self-praise.

From the moment Trump entered the political arena, Netanyahu recognised an opportunity to cultivate a relationship that would serve Israel’s interests over and above those of the US. Trump’s personality — marked by a craving for admiration, a fragile ego and an insatiable desire for validation — made him uniquely susceptible to flattery. Netanyahu, a seasoned con artist, tailored his approach adeptly to appeal to Trump’s vanity.

 Saudi prince to Trump: Let the Palestinians return to Jaffa and Haifa

Netanyahu’s comments at the press conference were particularly telling. While he spoke at length about the importance of US support for Israel, he made no mention of the Palestinian people or their rights. This erasure was not accidental; it was a deliberate attempt to sidestep Israel’s brutal military occupation, displacement and genocide.

Trump offered vague platitudes about peace and prosperity without addressing any recognition of Palestinians as a distinct people with legitimate rights.

While he expressed vague sympathy for the suffering, he never mentioned the Palestinian right to self-determination, freedom or equality. He never does. The omission is not accidental; it is a calculated move to delegitimise Palestinian aspirations and reinforce the narrative that their plight is merely a humanitarian issue rather than a political one rooted in decades of occupation and systemic injustice.

What was most striking about the news conference was its lack of substance. While the dire situation in Gaza and the West Bank grows increasingly grim, neither Trump nor Netanyahu offered any coherent response. Instead, they spent most of their time recounting past “achievements” and reiterating their commitment to a relationship that has increasingly come to symbolise one-sided support for Israeli policies.

One of Trump’s most grotesque proposals was his so-called vision for Gaza’s future. He spoke of creating jobs from the very destruction that Israel has inflicted upon the besieged territory with US-made and -supplied bombs.

It was as if the complete obliteration of an entire society were merely a business opportunity.

Would anyone have dared to suggest that the destruction of European cities at the hands of the “old Nazis” was a job creation opportunity? How about the opportunity for redeveloping the concentration camps in Poland? Would the survivors have accepted that narrative? Yet Trump wants the world to believe that the genocide of Gaza should be celebrated as a chance to “build back better”, albeit without the very people whose homeland it is.

Rather than holding Israel accountable for its destruction, Trump wants to reward it. His proposal was not about rebuilding Gaza for the sake of its people, but about finishing the job that Israel was unable to finish. After all, what better way to disguise forced displacement than by dressing it up as “urban renewal”?

Trump views Gaza not as a humanitarian catastrophe, but as a gentrification project, like a rundown building in New York City awaiting developers to swoop in and transform it for their own benefit. The difference, of course, is that this is not about real estate; this is about the systematic destruction of a people, their history and their right to exist.

READ: Republican Senator slams Trump’s Gaza ‘take over’ proposal

The Netanyahu-Trump press conference was more than just an embarrassing spectacle; it was also a lesson in what happens when leadership is all about self-interest and performative politics. Both individuals have long been known for their narcissism and their willingness to prioritise personal benefits over the public good, and this event was a perfect encapsulation of those flaws.

Trump’s proposal is not about rebuilding.

Gaza is not an economic development project. This is the final phase of a slow-motion genocide wrapped up in the language of business and diplomacy.

His suggestion for new opportunities following a war of destruction, would be like scavenging for crumbs in a landfill and calling it a feast. The idea that the Gaza genocide should be reframed as an economic opportunity is not just obscene; it is the final project of the dispossession and displacement of a whole society.

OPINION: It’s back to the future, as Nazi-neocon insanity prompts Trump’s ethnic cleansing plan

The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Monitor.