South Africa defends decision to ignore ICC over Sudan’s Bashir

South Africa told the International Criminal Court on Friday that it believed it was under no obligation to arrest Sudanese President Omar Hassan Al-Bashir during a visit two years ago even though he was subject to an ICC arrest warrant.

The ICC warrant did not outweigh a South African law that grants sitting heads of state immunity from prosecution, South African legal representative Dire Tladi told judges at a hearing to discuss Pretoria’s failure to arrest Al-Bashir in 2015.

Tladi argued:

There is no duty under international law and the Rome Statute to arrest a serving head of state of a non-state-party such as Omar Al-Bashir.

The row between South Africa and the ICC over its failure to arrest Al-Bashir, who is accused of genocide and war crimes, led to Pretoria’s notifying the United Nations last year that it would withdraw from the court.

Sudan slams UN call for president’s arrest

Earlier this year, a South African court blocked the move over procedural issues, but the government has said it will push ahead with the withdrawal.

Al-Bashir denies the charges against him. Though Sudan is not a member of the ICC, the court has jurisdiction by virtue of a 2005 UN Security Council resolution referring the conflict to the Hague-based permanent war crimes court.

Al-Bashir travels to Uganda in spite of international arrest warrant against him

Friday’s hearing was called so that the court can gather information on whether it should report South Africa either to the ICC’s governing body, the Assembly of State Parties, or to the UN Security Council for non-compliance with the court.