Portuguese / Spanish / English

Middle East Near You

US: No change to W. Bank policy after envoy goes rogue

US Ambassador to Israel David Friedman poses with a picture of the 'Third Temple' which Zionists wish to build on the site of Al-Aqsa Mosque in occupied Jerusalem on 22 May 2018 [Twitter]
US Ambassador to Israel David Friedman poses with a picture of the 'Third Temple' which Zionists wish to build on the site of Al-Aqsa Mosque in occupied Jerusalem on 22 May 2018 [Twitter]

The US said Monday there has been no change to its West Bank policy after Washington’s envoy to Israel stirred controversy with comments suggesting Israel has a right to annex parts of the occupied territory, Anadolu reports.

State Department spokeswoman Morgan Ortagus, however, brushed off suggestions Ambassador David Friedman would face any kind of internal disciplinary action for the remarks, saying “there is no plan” to do so.

“The administration’s position on the settlements has not changed. Our policy on the West Bank has not changed,” she said.

In an interview with The New York Times over the weekend, Friedman, a staunch supporter of Israeli settlement building, declined to say how Washington would respond if Israel moved to unilaterally annex West Bank land after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu promised to take the action in the run-up to April’s nationwide elections.

Read: Ex-Israel Defence Minister Ya’alon slams Netanyahu: ‘Hamas also elected democratically’

“Under certain circumstances,” Friedman said, “I think Israel has the right to retain some, but unlikely all, of the West Bank.”

Friedman’s comments elicited outrage from Palestinian officials who said they are considering filing a complaint against Friedman at the International Criminal Court (ICC).

Palestine’s Foreign Ministry issued a statement saying Friedman’s statements “give proof that he was a threat to peace and security in the region.”

The ministry said the envoy’s words were “an extension of the policy of the US administration, which is fully biased towards the occupation and its expansionist colonial policies.”

“What reasoning could justify Friedman’s logic that Israel has the right to annex parts of the West Bank?” the ministry asked. “International law prohibits the annexation of land by force, as well as a reality imposed by occupying powers.”

Israel occupied the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, during the 1967 Six-Day war.

Categories
Asia & AmericasIsraelMiddle EastNewsPalestineUS
Show Comments
Show Comments