Espanol / English

Middle East Near You

If Al-Aqsa is to be protected long-term, Israel’s occupation must end

Palestinians celebrate the removal of Israeli security measures at the entrances to Al-Aqsa Mosque Compound in Jerusalem, on 27 July 2017 [Mahmoud İbrahem/Anadolu Agency]
Palestinians hold flags outside the the Al-Aqsa Mosque Compound in Jerusalem, on 27 July 2017 [Mahmoud İbrahem/Anadolu Agency]

Palestinian resistance against Israel’s brutal occupation is littered with many setbacks. The latest confrontation over Al Aqsa Mosque was, however, a rare example of success. Israel’s fifty-year efforts to change the status quo in the Noble Sanctuary were dealt a major blow last week, one that highlighted several important lessons for both the occupier and the occupied.

On this occasion, the Israelis clearly went one step too far in their disregard for the religious sentiments of the Palestinian people and Muslims the world over. The decision by the Netanyahu government to close Al-Aqsa to Muslim worshippers after months of daily incursions by Jewish extremists had set alarm bells ringing that something very sinister was afoot.

All across the occupied Palestinian territories, the reaction was decisive and uncompromising: there will be no division or sharing of Al-Aqsa Mosque. The matter of its ownership was never in doubt; it belongs to the Muslims and, as far as the Palestinians are concerned, they were never going to betray their sacred responsibility as its custodians.

This is the reality that the Israeli leadership ignored at their peril. In fact, they overlooked the unifying potential of Al Aqsa. Palestinians will differ on many things, but if there is one issue that will unite them, it is the centrality of Jerusalem and the Noble Sanctuary of Al Aqsa in their lives.

The same, in fact, can be said about Muslims everywhere. Their political, sectarian and other differences will always pale into insignificance when their religious heritage and rights are threatened. Hence, the protests and outpouring of anger in cities from south-east Asia to Africa to Europe. Netanyahu and his government had, unintentionally, brought Muslims together around a single cause.

Read: 100 mosques in Sudan show solidarity with Al-Aqsa

The upshot of all this is that Israel will never have its way when Palestinians and Muslims are united. In other words, Israel will only appear to be strong when Palestinians and Muslims demonstrate weakness. Hence the efforts made by the Zionist state and its supporters to keep Muslims divided by sectarian and nationalistic in-fighting.

Another crucial lesson from the Aqsa standoff is the total insignificance of the official Arab leadership. Despite the gravity of the situation, the Arab League’s response was pitiful to the point of irrelevance; it failed to meet, even at a ministerial level, to address the threats to Al-Aqsa. Tellingly, two planned meetings were actually postponed. This failure was reminiscent of a similar farce back in 2009 in the wake of the Israeli military offensive against the Gaza Strip, which lead to the widespread destruction of property and more than 1,000 civilians being killed. At the time, a call for a special summit by the then Chair of the Arab League, Qatar, was rejected by eight of the 22-member organisation. Unsurprisingly, Mahmoud Abbas was among those who did not attend, citing his “inability” to be granted safe passage out of Ramallah as his excuse.

The Palestinian masses have learnt from bitter experience that it is a waste of time appealing to these regional leaders for sympathy, let alone support. Eight years on from the Doha summit on Gaza, the self-acclaimed “moderate” states have become even more aligned with Israel. Anyone who expected even a token declaration of support about Al-Aqsa was thus seriously deluded.


Moreover, what transpired in Jerusalem in the past week confirmed the saying popularised by former US President John F. Kennedy that, “Victory has a thousand fathers, but defeat is an orphan.” No wonder the regional media is now awash with farcical claims by kings and presidents that they were responsible for the reopening of Al-Aqsa.

Palestinians stage a protest against Israel’s restrictions on the Al-Aqsa Mosque on 20 July 2017 [Mamoun Wazwaz/Anadolu Agency]

Notwithstanding the truth or hollowness of these claims, there must be a sense of appreciation about what occurred. If Palestinians can unite to protect their religious heritage in Jerusalem, surely they can do the same to end Israel’s political dominance, military occupation and economic exploitation.

Indeed, there are other indignities and abnormalities in the Palestinian reality that cry out for change. The inhuman blockade of the Gaza Strip stands out painfully. In the same manner that national unity converged with international solidarity to end the standoff in Al-Aqsa, they must now combine to end the blockade of Gaza.

Finally, there must be no doubt about the direction that the conflict in Palestine is taking. Israel’s colonial-settler claims to the Islamic sites, especially Al-Aqsa, are nothing new. The fact that the Netanyahu government has backed off for now is not the end of the story. Israeli extremists will, sooner or later, try again to change the status quo at the sacred site. The threats to Al-Aqsa will remain for as long as the occupation exists. The overarching lesson, therefore, is that for Al-Aqsa to be protected in the long-term, Israel’s brutal military occupation must end.

Asia & AmericasCommentary & AnalysisIsraelMiddle EastOpinionPalestineUS
  • Pepper Wingate

    Now you are just slogan shouting. You haven’t read my comment nor have you responded to it. Jews are the indigenous people of Israel. Jews were living in Israel with legal claim to the land in 1948. Jews were attacked by 5 Arab armies and land was stolen from them . When they reclaimed that land in 1967 Arabs claimed it was stolen. That is a lie!

    • John the Savage

      I have read your comment. You are not in a position to say I haven’t. I have to emphasize certain points or you won’t notice them. Jews had no “legal claim” in 1948 except to land they personally owned. Arabs also had a legal claim to land they owned. As such, which state they are part of is irrelevant.

      • Pepper Wingate

        Legitimate judgement based on a complete lack of response to the points raised.
        To contradict you Yes Jews did have a perfectly legal claim and it has stood up in court many times in many nations. Jews owned many pieces of land. There was absolutely no government by Arabs of the land therefore they had no right to law making in the territory. I realise that the current Arab line is this nonsense but it is totally irrational.

        • John the Savage

          Tell me, which piece of land in Israel do I own?

          • Pepper Wingate

            There is always your grave if you should wish to take advantage of it.

  • John the Savage